Feminist Challenges to the New Familialism: Lifestyle Experimentation and the Freedom of Intimate Association
Graduate studies at Western
Hypatia 11 (1):135 - 154 (1996)
|Abstract||The new familialists argue that the decline of the intact two-parent family is responsible for our most pressing social problems and advocate public policies designed to promote family stability and discourage divorce and nonmarital births. This essay defends the freedom of intimate association and argue that family stability, while an important good, must be balanced with other goods such as equality and justice within the family, happiness, and individual self-development|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Linda Radzik (2005). Justice in the Family: A Defence of Feminist Contractarianism. Journal of Applied Philosophy 22 (1):45–54.
Veronique Munoz-Darde (1999). Is the Family to Be Abolished Then? Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 99 (1):37-56.
Corey Brettschneider (2007). The Politics of the Personal: A Liberal Approach. American Political Science Review 101 (1):19-31.
Stephen De Wijze (2000). The Family and Political Justice: The Case for Political Liberalisms. Journal of Ethics 4 (3):257 - 281.
Anne Alstott, Is the Family at Odds with Equality? The Legal Implications of the Egalitarian Family.
Brian Penrose (2000). Must the Family Be Just? Philosophical Papers 29 (3):189-221.
M. J. Cherry (2010). Parental Authority and Pediatric Bioethical Decision Making. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 35 (5):553-572.
Francis Schrag (1976). Justice and the Family. Inquiry 19 (1-4):193 – 208.
Added to index2010-08-10
Total downloads5 ( #170,048 of 732,605 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,087 of 732,605 )
How can I increase my downloads?