David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophy and Theology 15 (2):257-271 (2003)
God’s relationship to modalities poses a serious problem for the theist. If God determines modalities, then it seems that he can do anything. If, on the other hand, modalities determine God’s actions, then it seems that he is not genuinely free. Conceptualism offers a solution to this problem by maintaining that modalities are determined by what is conceivable for the intellects of the universe that God has chosen to create. Prior to the creation of intellects, there are no modalities restricting God’s choice. Consequently, God is genuinely free. What is more, prior to creation there are no modalities, thus it is not the case that anything is possible. However, there are several problems with conceptualism. In particular, because the necessary features of the modal concepts themselves are independent of the shape of any intellect, no form of conceptualism will succeed as a solution to the problem of modalities
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Jon McGinnis (2011). The Ultimate Why Question: Avicenna on Why God Is Absolutely Necessary. In The Ultimate Why Question: Why is There Anything at All Rather Than Nothing Whatsoever? Cath Univ Amer Pr.
Dominic Gregory (2011). Iterated Modalities, Meaning and A Priori Knowledge. Philosophers' Imprint 11 (3).
Brian MacPherson (1997). A Challenge to the Kripke/Putnam Distinction Between Epistemic and Metaphysical Necessity. Southwest Philosophy Review 13 (2):113--128.
James Cain (2004). Free Will and the Problem of Evil. Religious Studies 40 (4):437-456.
Thomas V. Morris (1984). Properties, Modalities, and God. Philosophical Review 93 (1):35-55.
Benedikt Paul Göcke (2009). Am I Divine? New Blackfriars 91 (1034):386-400.
John P. Burgess (2003). Which Modal Models Are the Right Ones (for Logical Necessity)? Theoria 18 (2):145-158.
Gordon D. Kaufman (2007). Special Topic: Confucian and Christian Conceptions of Creativity. Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 6 (2):105-113.
Heinrich Wansing (1998). Nested Deontic Modalities: Another View of Parking on Highways. [REVIEW] Erkenntnis 49 (2):185-199.
Gijsbert Van Den Brink (1993). Descartes, Modalities, and God. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 33 (1):1-15.
Gusbert Van Den Brink (1993). Descartes, Modalities, and God. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 33 (1):1 - 15.
Brian Leftow (2012). God and Necessity. Oxford University Press.
Kirk A. Ludwig (1996). Shape Properties and Perception. In Enrique Villanueva (ed.), Philosophical Issues. Atascadero: Ridgeview. 325-350.
Charles Billingsley (2009). God Laughs: And Other Surprising Things You Never Knew About Him. Regal Books.
Added to index2011-01-09
Total downloads8 ( #170,019 of 1,101,094 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #115,950 of 1,101,094 )
How can I increase my downloads?