David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
The philosophical understanding of moral conscience should constitute one of the most significant concerns of any modern theory of moral education that wishes to be credible and reliable in all morally demanding situations. The purpose of this paper is not to contest the widely accepted notion of conscience as the absolute mark of our moral and spiritual integrity. The purpose of the paper is to postulate and stress the importance of certain "contextual" factors without which modern teaching of moral conscience could very easily lose its certainty and significance. It is argued that unless we make such assumptions, our following the dictates of individual conscience could become a trivial and redundant affair, because nothing could prove that this act is something more than "listening to one's inner voice". In the light of this, the paper proposes a qualified theory that avoids looking at individual conscience as a formal schema and embraces it within the broader framework of the educational demands raised by modern democratic culture
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Edward Andrew & Peter Lindsay (2008). Are the Judgments of Conscience Unreasonable? Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 11 (2):235-254.
Mark C. Murphy (1997). The Conscience Principle. Journal of Philosophical Research 22:387-407.
William Lyons (2009). Conscience – an Essay in Moral Psychology. Philosophy 84 (4):477-494.
Joseph M. Grcic (1985). Democratic Capitalism: Developing a Conscience for the Corporation. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 4 (2):145 - 150.
Edmund Leites (ed.) (1988). Conscience and Casuistry in Early Modern Europe. Editions De La Maison des Sciences De L'Homme.
Peter Godman (2009). Paradoxes of Conscience in the High Middle Ages: Abelard, Heloise, and the Archpoet. Cambridge University Press.
Edward Vallance & Harald Braun (eds.) (2004). Contexts of Conscience in Early Modern Europe, 1500-1700. Palgrave Macmillan.
Michael W. Hickson (2010). Conscientious Refusals Without Conscience. Philo 13 (2):167-184.
Hayden Ramsay (2001). Conscience: Aquinas — with a Hint of Aristotle. Sophia 40 (2):15-29.
John J. Hardt (2008). The Conscience Debate: Resources for Rapprochement From the Problem's Perceived Source. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 29 (3):151-160.
Jason J. Howard (2004). Kant and Moral Imputation. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 78 (4):609-627.
Donovan Miyasaki (2010). Nietzsche Contra Freud on Bad Conscience. Nietzsche-Studien 39 (1).
Jens Timmermann (2006). Kant on Conscience, “Indirect” Duty, and Moral Error. International Philosophical Quarterly 46 (3):293-308.
Added to index2011-12-02
Total downloads3 ( #297,257 of 1,102,697 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #296,698 of 1,102,697 )
How can I increase my downloads?