David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 2:159-163 (2006)
By the late twentieth century, the liberal definition of a citizen as an individual with equal rights under the protection of the law has failed to respond to the demands of the members of contemporary plural societies. The recent discussions in political philosophy between Kantian liberal approaches and their communitarian and republican critics are relevant to this challenge. These criticisms are, in one way or another, related to the main principles of Western liberal thought. The communitarians take a stand against the priority of rights over conceptions of the good in liberal politics. They also criticize the ontological assumption of the individual as an "unencumbered" self. The absence of a substantive common good and the separation of politics and morality are the shortcomings of liberalism that are stressed by both communitarians and republicans. In contrast to liberals' emphasis on rights, republicans underline the role of duties and active participation as the constitutive elements of citizenship. In fact, they reverse the relation between rights and politics as it is understood in liberalism: they regard rights as the products of the political process, rather than its presuppositions
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Meghan Benton (2010). The Tyranny of the Enfranchised Majority? The Accountability of States to Their Non-Citizen Population. Res Publica 16 (4):397-413.
Erol Kuyurtar (2007). Are Cultural Group Rights Against Individual Rights? The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 3:51-59.
David Hollenbach (1998). Solidarity, Development, and Human Rights: The African Challenge. Journal of Religious Ethics 26 (2):305 - 317.
Michael Freeman (2002). Past Wrongs and Liberal Justice. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 5 (2):201-220.
Chakravarthi Ram-Prasad (2012). Pluralism and Liberalism: Reading the Indian Constitution as a Philosophical Document for Constitutional Patriotism. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 16 (5):676-697.
M. Andrew Holowchak (2006). Liberal Individualism, Autonomy, and the Great Divide. Philosophy in the Contemporary World 13 (1):20-27.
A. Mason (2011). Citizenship and Justice. Politics, Philosophy and Economics 10 (3):263-281.
Neera Kapur Badhwar (1993). The Circumstances of Justice: Pluralism, Community, and Friendship. Journal of Political Philosophy 1 (3):250–276.
Andy Lamey (2012). A Liberal Theory of Asylum. Politics, Philosophy and Economics 11 (3):235-257.
Monique Lanoix (2007). The Citizen in Question. Hypatia 22 (4):113-129.
Randall Peerenboom (2000). The Limits of Irony: Rorty and the China Challenge. Philosophy East and West 50 (1):56-89.
Jeffrey Friedman (1994). The Politics of Communitarianism. Critical Review 8 (2):297-340.
Added to index2011-12-02
Total downloads4 ( #234,508 of 1,096,264 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #126,669 of 1,096,264 )
How can I increase my downloads?