What Does It Mean to Claim that Something Is 'Innate'? Response to Clark, Harris, Lightfoot and Samuels
Mind and Language 13 (4):588-597 (1998)
|Abstract||This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)|
|Keywords||Epistemology Innateness Language Neurobiology Clark, A|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Adele A. Abrahamsen (1993). Cognizers' Innards and Connectionist Nets: A Holy Alliance? Mind and Language 8 (4):520-530.
Muhammad Ali Khalidi (2009). Should We Eliminate the Innate? Reply to Griffiths and Machery. Philosophical Psychology 22 (4):505 – 519.
Keith Butler (1993). On Clark on Systematicity and Connectionism. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 44 (1):37-44.
Muhammad Ali Khalidi (2001). Innateness and Domain-Specificity. Philosophical Studies 105 (2):191-210.
Kenneth Aizawa (1999). Jeffrey L. Elman, Elizabeth A. Bates, Mark H. Johnson, Annette Karmiloff-Smith, Domenico Parisi, and Kim Plunkett, (Eds.), Rethinking Innateness: A Connectionist Perspective on Development, Neural Network Modeling and Connectionism Series and Kim Plunkett and Jeffrey L. Elman, Exercises in Rethinking Innateness: A Handbook for Connectionist Simulations. [REVIEW] Minds and Machines 9 (3):447-456.
Muhammad Ali Khalidi (2007). Innate Cognitive Capacities. Mind and Language 22 (1):92-115.
Christopher D. Viger (2005). Learning to Think: A Response to the Language of Thought Argument for Innateness. Mind and Language 20 (3):313-25.
Richard Samuels (2004). Innateness in Cognitive Science. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 8 (3):136-141.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads17 ( #78,020 of 722,815 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #60,541 of 722,815 )
How can I increase my downloads?