American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 76 (1):165-180 (2002)
|Abstract||Maimonides’ attitude to animals in his ethical teachings is not the same in all his works. His cosmological outlook changed over the years, as shown in the justification he gives for the existence of animals. In a youthful work he presents a teleological, anthropocentric viewpoint, according to which animals are merely a means to an end and were created solely to serve man. However, in The Guide of the Perplexed, written in his old age, he argues that every creature was created for its own sake, since existence is good in itself. Another difference is the expansion of his rationalistic approach to the precepts of the Torah. Only in his late works does he argue that every divine command can be explained. As a consequence, one finds in The Guide of the Perplexed ethical explanations of precepts concerning animals, as well as the argument that there is sometimes no difference between the suffering of animals and human beings. In his earlier works, however, he had stated that such precepts were entirely arbitrary|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Daniel H. Frank (2002). The Development of Maimonides' Moral Psychology. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 76 (1):89-105.
Kay Peggs (2012). Animals and Sociology. Palgrave Macmillan.
Alice Crary (2010). Minding What Already Matters. Philosophical Topics 38 (1):17-49.
Holly L. Wilson (2011). Kant's Treatment of Animals. In Paul Pojman (ed.), Food Ethics. Wadsworth.
Mark H. Bernstein (2004). Without a Tear: Our Tragic Relationship with Animals. University of Illinois Press.
Alasdair Cochrane (2011). An Introduction to Animals and Political Theory. Palgrave Macmillan.
Kelly Oliver (2010). Animal Ethics: Toward an Ethics of Responsiveness. Research in Phenomenology 40 (2):267-280.
Donna Yarri (2005). The Ethics of Animal Experimentation: A Critical Analysis and Constructive Christian Proposal. OUP USA.
Michael Forest (2004). Hierarchy and the Animals. Philosophy in the Contemporary World 11 (2):31-36.
Patrick Kain (2010). Duties Regarding Animals. In Lara Denis (ed.), Kant's Metaphysics of Morals: A Critical Guide. Cambridge University Press.
Paul Shapiro (2006). Moral Agency in Other Animals. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 27 (4):357-373.
Francine L. Dolins (ed.) (1999). Attitudes to Animals: Views in Animal Welfare. Cambridge University Press.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2011-02-22
Total downloads1 ( #274,507 of 548,977 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?