Are research subjects adequately protected? A review and discussion of studies conducted by the advisory committee on human radiation experiments
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 6 (3):271-282 (1996)
: In light of information uncovered about human radiation experiments conducted during the Cold War, an important charge for the Advisory Committee on Human Radiation Experiments was to assess the current state of protections for human research subjects. This assessment was designed to enhance the Committee's ability to make informed recommendations for the improvement of future policies and practices for the protection of research subjects. The Committee's examination of current protections revealed great improvement over those from the past, yet some problems remain. Although the data collected by the Committee highlight specific areas in need of attention, the Committee's work should be viewed in part as the beginning of a series of ongoing assessments of the adequacy and effectiveness of the protections afforded to human subjects
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Celia B. Fisher, Susan Z. Kornetsky & Ernest D. Prentice (2007). Determining Risk in Pediatric Research with No Prospect of Direct Benefit: Time for a National Consensus on the Interpretation of Federal Regulations. American Journal of Bioethics 7 (3):5 – 10.
Marcel J. H. Kenter (2009). Regulating Human Participants Protection in Medical Research and the Accreditation of Medical Research Ethics Committees in the Netherlands. Journal of Academic Ethics 7 (1-2):33-43.
Anna Mastroianni & Jeffrey Kahn (1996). Remedies for Human Subjects of Cold?War Research: Recommendations of the Advisory Committee. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 24 (2):118-126.
Allen E. Buchanan (1996). The Controversy Over Retrospective Moral Judgment. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 6 (3):245-250.
Ruth R. Faden (1996). Chair's Perspective on the Work of the Advisory Committee on Human Radiation Experiments. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 6 (3):215-221.
Charles Weijer, The Human Radiation Experiments: Final Report of the Advisory Committee on Human Radiation Experiments.
Tom L. Beauchamp (1996). Looking Back and Judging Our Predecessors. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 6 (3):251-270.
Jonathan D. Moreno & Susan E. Lederer (1996). Revising the History of Cold War Research Ethics. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 6 (3):223-237.
Ruth Macklin (1996). Disagreement, Consensus, and Moral Integrity. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 6 (3):289-311.
Jeremy Sugarman & Nancy E. Kass (1996). Are Research Subjects Adequately Protected? A Review and Discussion of Studies Conducted by the Advisory Committee on Human Radiation Experiments. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 6 (3):271-282.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads4 ( #272,063 of 1,139,990 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #157,514 of 1,139,990 )
How can I increase my downloads?