Do we need a specific kind of technoscience assessment? Taking the convergence of science and technology seriously
Poiesis and Praxis 7 (1-2):37-54 (2010)
|Abstract||The presented paper addresses the concept of technoscience and its possible implications for technology assessment. Drawing on the discourse about converging technologies, it formulates the assumption that a general shift within science from epistemic cultures to techno-epistemic cultures lies at the heart of the propagated convergence between nano-, bio-, info- and cogno-sciences and technologies. This shift is adequately capturedâso the main thesisâby the technoscience label. The paper elaborates on the shared characteristics of the new technosciences, especially their hybrid character and their non-linear integration of basic research, object construction and technological innovation. Recent calls for new modes of technology governance (e.g. for upstream technology assessment and public participation) are discussed against the background of these technoscience characteristics. It is concluded that an adequate model of emerging technosciences and a detailed understanding of their characteristics is of paramount importance for current practices of technology assessment.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Karen Kastenhofer & Jan C. Schmidt (2011). Technoscientia Est Potentia? Poiesis and Praxis 8 (2-3):125-149.
Karen Kastenhofer & Doris Allhutter (2010). Technoscience and Technology Assessment. Poiesis and Praxis 7 (1-2):1-4.
Wolfgang Liebert & Jan C. Schmidt (2010). Towards a Prospective Technology Assessment: Challenges and Requirements for Technology Assessment in the Age of Technoscience. [REVIEW] Poiesis and Praxis 7 (1-2):99-116.
Ramón Queraltó (2008). The Philosophical Impact of Technoscience or the Development of a Pragmatic Philosophy of Science. Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 96 (1):113-125.
Ulrich Fiedeler (2011). When Does the Co-Evolution of Technology and Science Overturn Into Technoscience? Poiesis and Praxis 8 (2-3):83-101.
Wolfgang Liebert & Jan C. Schmidt (2010). Collingridge's Dilemma and Technoscience. Poiesis and Praxis 7 (1-2):55-71.
Karen Kastenhofer & Astrid Schwarz (2011). Probing Technoscience. Poiesis and Praxis 8 (2-3):61-65.
Jutta Weber (2010). Making Worlds: Epistemological, Ontological and Political Dimensions of Technoscience. [REVIEW] Poiesis and Praxis 7 (1-2):17-36.
Alfred Nordmann (2010). A Forensics of Wishing: Technology Assessment in the Age of Technoscience. [REVIEW] Poiesis and Praxis 7 (1-2):5-15.
Barry Barnes (2005). Elusive Memories of Technoscience. Perspectives on Science 13 (2):142-165.
Joachim Schummer, From Nano-Convergence to NBIC-Convergence: “The Best Way to Predict the Future is to Create It”.
Ursula Klein (2005). Technoscience. Perspectives on Science 13 (2).
Don Ihde (2010). Heidegger's Technologies: Postphenomenological Perspectives. Fordham University Press.
Thomas Saretzki (2012). Legitimation Problems of Participatory Processes in Technology Assessment and Technology Policy. Poiesis and Praxis 9 (1-2):7-26.
Jonathan Harwood (2005). On the Genesis of Technoscience: A Case Study of German Agricultural Education. Perspectives on Science 13 (3):329-351.
Added to index2010-09-14
Total downloads14 ( #90,445 of 722,700 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #60,247 of 722,700 )
How can I increase my downloads?