Graduate studies at Western
|Abstract||A modified version of Young's experiment by Shahriar Afshar demonstrates that, prior to a ``which-way'' measurement indicating which slit a particle goes through, an interference pattern exists. It has been claimed that this result constitutes a violation of the Principle of Complementarity. This paper discusses the implications of this experiment and considers how Cramer's Transactional Interpretation accomodates the result. It is shown that the Afshar experiment is isomorphic in key respects to a a spin one-half particle prepared as ``spin up along x'' and post-selected in a specific state of spin along z. It is concluded that Bohr would have had no more problem accounting for the Afshar result than he would in accounting for the aforementioned pre- and post-selection spin experiment, in which the particle's preparation state is confirmed by a nondestructive measurement prior to post-selection.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Only published papers are available at libraries|
Similar books and articles
Daniel Fels (2012). Analogy Between Quantum and Cell Relations. Axiomathes 22 (4):509-520.
J. V. Corbett & T. Durt (2010). An Intuitionistic Model of Single Electron Interference. Studia Logica 95 (1/2):81 - 100.
William Seager (1996). A Note on the 'Quantum Eraser'. Philosophy of Science 63 (1):81-90.
Ruth E. Kastner (2004). Shutters, Boxes, but No Paradoxes: Time Symmetry Puzzles in Quantum Theory. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 18 (1):89 – 94.
Ruth Kastner (2005). Why the Afshar Experiment Does Not Refute Complementarity. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 36 (4):649-658.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads11 ( #107,456 of 739,346 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,538 of 739,346 )
How can I increase my downloads?