David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophical Papers 31 (2):199-215 (2002)
Abstract In this paper I suggest a way that an already promising view on ethical art criticism can account for the value of mediocre artworks which endorse morally commendable perspectives. In order for the view I call prescriptive ethicism to deal with such cases of critical ambivalence, it must take account of the interaction between moral content and form in art. Such interaction is seen in the way the aesthetic features of an artwork partly determine its moral value, or success in providing ethical insight. I argue that if a work lacks the kind of moral value which is determined by the interaction between form and content, then we have little reason to engage with that work. When a work expresses an otherwise commendable moral attitude in a clumsy or trite manner, while it is clearly compromised aesthetically, it is also compromised ethically. For such a work forfeits the ability to reveal new aspects of ethical life
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Robert Stecker (2005). The Interaction of Ethical and Aesthetic Value. British Journal of Aesthetics 45 (2):138-150.
Rob van Gerwen (2004). Ethical Autonomism. The Work of Art as a Moral Agent. Contemporary Aesthetics 2.
Katherine Thomson-Jones (2012). Art, Ethics, and Critical Pluralism. Metaphilosophy 43 (3):275-293.
Raja Halwani (2009). Ethicism, Interpretation, and Munich. Journal of Applied Philosophy 26 (1):71-87.
James Harold (2006). On Judging the Moral Value of Narrative Artworks. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 64 (2):259–270.
Aaron Smuts (2011). Grounding Moralism: Moral Flaws and Aesthetic Properties. Journal of Aesthetic Education 45 (4):34-53.
Kenneth R. Westphal (1997). ‘Hegel, Formalism, and Robert Turner’s Ceramic Art’. Jahrbuch für Hegelforschung 3:259–283.
Andrea Sauchelli (2012). Ethicism and Immoral Cognitivism: Gaut Versus Kieran on Art and Morality. Journal of Aesthetic Education 46 (3):107-118.
Marcia Muelder Eaton (2001). Merit, Aesthetic and Ethical. Oxford University Press.
Jonathan Gilmore (2011). A Functional View of Artistic Evaluation. Philosophical Studies 155 (2):289-305.
Hallvard Lillehammer (2008). Values of Art and the Ethical Question. British Journal of Aesthetics 48 (4):376-394.
Donovan Miyasaki (2007). Against the Moral Appraisal of Art: Wayne Booth and the Case of Huck Finn. Philosophy and Literature 31 (1):125-32.
Steven A. Jauss (2008). Affective Responses, Normative Requirements, and Ethical-Aesthetic Interaction. Philosophia 36 (3):285-298.
Added to index2010-08-24
Total downloads8 ( #276,630 of 1,726,085 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #289,836 of 1,726,085 )
How can I increase my downloads?