Do many private worlds imply no real world? An analysis of the comparative argument in psychology

&
Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 9 (3):289–301 (1979)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Add categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1111/j.1468-5914.1979.tb00431.x

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,164

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Neonate crusoes, the private language argument and psychology.Douglas N. Walton & K. T. Strongman - 1998 - Philosophical Psychology 11 (4):443-65.
What, if anything, is represented? Objects in their worlds.David L. Thompson - manuscript
Epistemological requirements for a cognitive psychology of real people.John Campion - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (1):18-19.
The best of all possible worlds.Campbell Brown & Y. Nagasawa - 2005 - Synthese 143 (3):309-320.
Wittgenstein on private language and privat mental objects.Dale Jacquette - 1994 - Wittgenstein-Studien 1 (1).

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
20 (#716,889)

6 months
2 (#1,114,623)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

Design for a Brain.W. Ross Ashby - 1953 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 4 (14):169-173.

Add more references