Health care ethics and health law in the dutch discussion on end-of-life decisions: A historical analysis of the dynamics and development of both disciplines
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C 34 (4):669-684 (2003)
Over the past three or four decades, the concept of medical ethics has changed from a limited set of standards to a broad field of debate and research. We define medical ethics as an arena of moral issues in medicine, rather than a specific discipline. This paper examines how the disciplines of health care ethics and health care law have developed and operated within this arena. Our framework highlights the aspects of jurisdiction (Abbott) and the assignment of responsibilities (Gusfield). This theoretical framework prompted us to study definitions and changing responsibilities in order to describe the development and interaction of health care ethics and health law. We have opted for the context of the Dutch debate about end-of-life decisions as a relevant case study. We argue that the specific Dutch definition of euthanasia as 'intentionally taking the life of another person by a physician, upon that person's request' can be seen as the result of the complex jurisdictional process. This illustrates the more general conclusion that the Dutch debate on end-of-life decisions and the development of the two disciplines must be understood in terms of mutual interaction.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Helen Keasberry (1992). Equity and Solidarity: The Context of Health Care in the Netherlands. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 17 (4):463-477.
Rogeer Hoedemaekers & Wija Oortwijn (2003). Problematic Notions in Dutch Health Care Package Decisions. Health Care Analysis 11 (4):287-294.
Margaret Brazier & Mary Lobjoit (eds.) (1991). Protecting the Vulnerable: Autonomy and Consent in Health Care. Routledge.
Rogeer Hoedemaekers & Wim Dekkers (2003). Key Concepts in Health Care Priority Setting. Health Care Analysis 11 (4):309-323.
Fuat S. Oduncu (2003). Where to Set Limits in (End-of-Life) Medicine? Historical, Cultural, Philosophical and Medical Aspects in a Dutch-German Comparison. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 6 (3):315-318.
Jerry Goodstein (2002). Fulfilling Institutional Responsibilities in Health Care. Business Ethics Quarterly 12 (4):433-450.
John A. Gallagher & Jerry Goodstein (2002). Fulfilling Institutional Responsibilities in Health Care: Organizational Ethics and the Role of Mission Discernment. Business Ethics Quarterly 12 (4):433-450.
William M. Sage (2010). Will Embryonic Stem Cells Change Health Policy? Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 38 (2):342-351.
Gert Olthuis & Godelieve Heterevann (2003). Multicultural Health Care in Practice. Health Care Analysis 11 (3):199-206.
Mary Ann Baily (2011). Futility, Autonomy, and Cost in End-of-Life Care. Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 39 (2):172-182.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads12 ( #318,559 of 1,937,420 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #161,054 of 1,937,420 )
How can I increase my downloads?