Graduate studies at Western
|Abstract||The computation of both Scalar Implicatures (SI) and Association with Focus (AF) is characterized with reference to sets of alternatives. However, it has generally been assumed that the relevant alternatives are determined in different ways for the two processes. Specifically, it has been assumed that the alternatives for SI – scalar alternatives – are computed by a special procedure specifically designed for implicatures, whereas the alternatives for AF – focus alternatives – are determined by the general theory of association with focus – focus semantics. As far as we know, the only attempt to connect the two is Krifka (1995), under which scalar alternatives and focus alternatives are identical and determined by focus semantics. However, Krifka’s result is based on a specific stipulation about scalar items, which he borrows from Horn and incorporates into focus semantics, namely that scalar items are inherently focused and have their Horn Scale as their lexically specified focus values.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Only published papers are available at libraries|
Similar books and articles
Jonathan Schaffer (2001). Knowledge, Relevant Alternatives and Missed Clues. Analysis 61 (3):202–208.
Sigrid Beck (2006). Focus on Again. Linguistics and Philosophy 29 (3):277 - 314.
Bart Geurts (2010). Quantity Implicatures. Cambridge University Press.
L. Alonso-Ovalle & P. Menendez-Benito (2013). Indefinites, Dependent Plurality, and the Viability Requirement on Scalar Alternatives. Journal of Semantics 30 (1):65-102.
Palle Yourgrau (1983). Knowledge and Relevant Alternatives. Synthese 55 (2):175 - 190.
Roni Katzir (2007). Structurally-Defined Alternatives. Linguistics and Philosophy 30 (6):669-690.
Added to index2009-09-21
Total downloads70 ( #15,098 of 740,419 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,680 of 740,419 )
How can I increase my downloads?