David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Synthese 165 (3):385 - 401 (2008)
In this paper I discuss some of the criteria that are widely used in the linguistic and philosophical literature to classify an aspect of meaning as either semantic or pragmatic. With regards to the case of scalar implicature (e.g. some Fs are G implying that not all Fs are G), these criteria are not ultimately conclusive, either in the results of their application, or in the interpretation of the results with regards to the semantics/pragmatics distinction (or in both). I propose a psychologically relevant criterion, that of the primary or secondary role of context. This criterion applies to sub-personal processes that derive the interpretation of a scalar term rather than to the eventual interpretation of the term, and there exist well-established experimental paradigms that can generate quantitative data. I present recent studies on scalar implicature which employ such off-line and real-time paradigms, aiming to demonstrate how research on the semantics/pragmatics distinction can benefit from experimental investigation.
|Keywords||Scalar implicature Processing Psycholinguistics|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Herman Cappelen (2005). Insensitive Semantics: A Defense of Semantic Minimalism and Speech Act Pluralism. Blackwell Pub..
R. Carston (2002). Thoughts and Utterances. Blackwell.
D. Sperber & D. Wilson (1995). Relevance. Blackwell.
Stephen C. Levinson (2000). Presumptive Meanings: The Theory of Generalized Conversational Implicature. MIT Press.
Kent Bach (1994). Conversational Impliciture. Mind and Language 9 (2):124-162.
Citations of this work BETA
Michael Blome-Tillmann (2013). Conversational Implicatures (and How to Spot Them). Philosophy Compass 8 (2):170-185.
Napoleon Katsos & Dorothy V. M. Bishop (2011). Pragmatic Tolerance: Implications for the Acquisition of Informativeness and Implicature. Cognition 120 (1):67-81.
Richard Breheny, Heather J. Ferguson & Napoleon Katsos (2013). Taking the Epistemic Step: Toward a Model of on-Line Access to Conversational Implicatures. Cognition 126 (3):423-440.
Similar books and articles
Noel Burton-Roberts (ed.) (2007). Pragmatics. Palgrave Macmillan.
Leon Horsten (2005). On the Quantitative Scalar or-Implicature. Synthese 146 (1-2):111 - 127.
A. Papafragou (2003). Scalar Implicatures: Experiments at the Semantics–Pragmatics Interface. Cognition 86 (3):253-282.
Arnold Chien (2008). Scalar Implicature and Contrastive Explanation. Synthese 161 (1):47 - 66.
Bart Geurts (2009). Scalar Implicature and Local Pragmatics. Mind and Language 24 (1):51-79.
Jay David Atlas (2005). Logic, Meaning, and Conversation: Semantical Underdeterminacy, Implicature, and Their Interface. Oxford University Press.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads258 ( #8,117 of 1,790,117 )
Recent downloads (6 months)70 ( #13,847 of 1,790,117 )
How can I increase my downloads?