David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Faith and Philosophy 6 (1):35-46 (1989)
Current discussions of “evidentialism” seem to presuppose essentially traditional theistic conceptions and formulations. For many theologians. however, these have become problematic because of (a) the rise of a new consciousness of the significance of religiouspluralism; (b) the emergence of theories about the ways in which our symbolic frames of orientation shape all our experiencing and thinking; (c) a growing awareness that significant responsibility for some of the major evils of the twentieth century must be laid to ourreligious traditions. Since recent discussion of “evidentialism” continues to employ traditional symbols and concepts without sensitivity to these matters, it has not attracted much interest among contemporary theologians
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Sheila Greeve Davaney (1991). Directions in Historicism: Language, Experience, and Pragmatic Adjudication. Zygon 26 (2):201-220.
Similar books and articles
James A. Keller (1995). Should Christian Theologians Become Christian Philosophers? Faith and Philosophy 12 (2):260-268.
Scott F. Aikin (2006). Modest Evidentialism. International Philosophical Quarterly 46 (3):327-343.
Alvin I. Goldman (2011). Toward a Synthesis of Reliabilism and Evidentialism? Or: Evidentialism's Troubles, Reliabilism's Rescue Package. In Trent Dougherty (ed.), Evidentialism and its Discontents. Oxford University Press.
Andrew Reisner (2007). Evidentialism and the Numbers Game. Theoria 73 (4):304-316.
Earl Conee & Richard Feldman (2004). Evidentialism. Oxford University Press.
Allen Wood (2008). The Duty to Believe According to the Evidence. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 63 (1/3):7 - 24.
Anthony Robert Booth (2007). The Two Faces of Evidentialism. Erkenntnis 67 (3):401 - 417.
T. Dougherty (ed.) (2011). Evidentialism and its Discontents. Oxford University Press.
Jason Baehr (2009). Evidentialism, Vice, and Virtue. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 78 (3):545-567.
Daniel M. Mittag, Evidentialism. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Michael Bergmann (2011). Evidentialism and the Great Pumpkin Objection. In Trent Dougherty (ed.), Evidentialism and its Discontents. Oxford University Press. 123.
L. Leydon-Hardy (2012). Evidentialism and its Discontents * Edited by Trent Dougherty. Analysis 72 (4):852-854.
Keith Lehrer (2011). Evidentialism and the Paradox of Parity. In Trent Dougherty (ed.), Evidentialism and its Discontents. Oxford University Press.
Duncan Pritchard (2011). Evidentialism, Internalism, Disjunctivism. In Trent Dougherty (ed.), Evidentialism and its Discontents. Oxford University Press.
Added to index2011-01-09
Total downloads3 ( #299,402 of 1,102,450 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #298,715 of 1,102,450 )
How can I increase my downloads?