David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Social Philosophy Today 20:41-52 (2004)
In this essay I analyze and defend the common sense moral conviction that terrorism, i.e., the use of violence against civilians for political or military purposes, is always morally impermissible. Terrorism violates the fundamental moral prohibition against harming the innocent, even to produce greater overall good. It is therefore just the sort of case that serves as a refutation of consequentialist moral theories. From a deontological perspective, the only remotely plausible forms of justification for a terrorist act would be that it constitutes a form of justifiable punishment of the guilty, or that it is legitimate self-defense against an aggressor. But an examination of the fundamental moral and legal principles of punishment and self-defense demonstrates that neither of these claims can succeed. Since terrorism cannot be justified either as punishment or as self-defense, it cannot be morally justified at all
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Anne Schwenkenbecher (2009). Terrorism, Supreme Emergency and Killing the Innocent. Perspectives - The Review of International Affairs 17 (1):105-126.
Vicente Medina (2006). Unconditional Vs. Conditional Critics of Terrorist Violence: A Seemingly Endless Debate. Public Affairs Quarterly 20 (4):363-379.
Alan S. Rosenbaum (2003). On Terrorism and the Just War. International Journal of Applied Philosophy 17 (2):173-196.
Scott C. Lowe (2006). Defining Terrorism. The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 2:253-256.
Anne Schwenkenbecher (2010). Terrorism Against Non-Innocents: The Ethical Implications. In Paul Omoyefa (ed.), Basic Applied Ethics. VDM.
Mark R. Reiff (2008). Terrorism, Retribution, and Collective Responsibility. Social Theory and Practice 34 (2):209-242.
Virginia Held (2004). Terrorism and War. Journal of Ethics 8 (1):59-75.
Rekha Nath (forthcoming). Two Wrong Don't Make a Right: A Critique of Virgina Held's Deontological Justification of Terrorism. Social Theory and Practice.
Troy Jollimore (2007). Terrorism, War, and the Killing of the Innocent. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 10 (4):353 - 372.
Simon Glynn (2007). Some Reflections Upon the Supposed Moral Distinction Between Terrorism and the Legitimate Use of Military Force. The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 1:207-211.
Whitley Kaufman (2010). Self-Defense, Innocent Aggressors, and the Duty of Martyrdom. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 91 (1):78-96.
Added to index2011-12-02
Total downloads28 ( #59,694 of 1,096,620 )
Recent downloads (6 months)7 ( #30,160 of 1,096,620 )
How can I increase my downloads?