David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Inquiry 14 (1-4):191 – 206 (1971)
The author's main practical aim is to defend liberal doctrines to which he is committed against certain fashionable criticisms. An elucidation of human needs is offered. The key claim is that human needs entail human rights. It is argued that the account proposed fits Marx's conception of human needs, and that, therefore, Marx was implicitly committed to a theory of human rights. It is then argued that John Stuart Mill was also, though implicitly, committed to a theory of human needs. These conceptual and moral affinities help to explain why, in recent years, the two political traditions of which Marx and Mill were principal architects, have tended to converge in theory and in practice. The main shift in moral viewpoint has, however, been a movement by Marxists toward the sort of liberalism defended by Mill
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Robert C. Tucker (1972/1961). Philosophy and Myth in Karl Marx. Cambridge [Eng.]University Press.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
David Ingram (2003). Between Political Liberalism and Postnational Cosmopolitanism: Toward an Alternative Theory of Human Rights. Political Theory 31 (3):359-391.
Horacio Spector (2007). Autonomy and Rights: The Moral Foundations of Liberalism. Oxford University Press.
Andy Lamey (2012). A Liberal Theory of Asylum. Politics, Philosophy and Economics 11 (3):235-257.
Douglas B. Rasmussen (2009). Liberalism in Retreat. Review of Metaphysics 62 (4):875-908.
Steven B. Smith (1989). Hegel's Critique of Liberalism: Rights in Context. University of Chicago Press.
Terrell Carver (2008). Liberalism, Reason(Ableness) and the Politicization of Truth: Marx's Critique and the Ironies of Marxism. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 11 (2):115-129.
Gerald Gaus (2010). On Two Critics of Justificatory Liberalism: A Response to Wall and Lister. Politics, Philosophy and Economics 9 (2):177-212.
Randall Peerenboom (2000). The Limits of Irony: Rorty and the China Challenge. Philosophy East and West 50 (1):56-89.
John Gray (2000). Mill's Liberalism and Liberalism's Posterity. Journal of Ethics 4 (1-2):137-165.
Added to index2009-02-04
Total downloads5 ( #338,493 of 1,700,303 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #362,609 of 1,700,303 )
How can I increase my downloads?