Incremental encoding and incremental articulation in speech production: Evidence based on response latency and initial segment duration
Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (1):48-49 (1999)
| Abstract | The WEAVER++ model discussed by Levelt et al. assumes incremental encoding and articulation following complete encoding. However, many of the response latency results can also be accounted for by assuming incremental articulation. Another temporal variable, initial segment duration, can distinguish WEAVER++'s incremental encoding account from the incremental articulation account. | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | No categories specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,705 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesH. M. Malm (1989). Commodification or Compensation: A Reply to Ketchum. Hypatia 4 (3):128 - 135.
Antje S. Meyer & Willem J. M. Levelt (2000). Merging Speech Perception and Production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (3):339-340.
Linda R. Wheeldon (1999). Competitive Processes During Word-Form Encoding. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (1):59-60.
P. X. Monaghan (2010). A Novel Interpretation of Plato's Theory of Forms. Metaphysica 11 (1):63-78.
Jan van Eijck (2001). Incremental Dynamics. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 10 (3):319-351.
Franz Huber (2005). What Is the Point of Confirmation? Philosophy of Science 72 (5):1146-1159.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads2 ( #232,628 of 549,198 )Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
