Graduate studies at Western
Philosophia 32 (1-4):389-398 (2005)
|Abstract||A paradox involving promises to perform supererogatory actions is developed. Several attempts to resolve the problem, focusing in particular on changing our understanding of supererogatory actions, are explored. It is concluded that none of the proposed solutions are viable; the problem lies in promises with certain contents, not in our understanding of supererogation.|
|Keywords||promising obligation right action supererogation|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Douglas W. Portmore (forthcoming). Supererogation. In J. E. Crimmins & D. C. Long (eds.), Encyclopedia of Utilitarianism.
David Heyd (2005). Supererogatory Promises a Comment on Kawal's “Promising and Supererogation”. Philosophia 32 (1-4):399-403.
Jason Kawall (2003). Self-Regarding Supererogatory Actions. Journal of Social Philosophy 34 (3):487–498.
Jean-Paul Vessel (2010). Supererogation for Utilitarianism. American Philosophical Quarterly 47 (4):299 - 319.
Jason Kawall (2009). Virtue Theory, Ideal Observers, and the Supererogatory. Philosophical Studies 146 (2):179-96.
Roderick M. Chisholm & Ernest Sosa (1966). Intrinsic Preferability and the Problem of Supererogation. Synthese 16 (3-4):321 - 331.
David Heyd (1982). Supererogation: Its Status in Ethical Theory. Cambridge University Press.
Gregory Mellema (1996). Is It Bad to Omit an Act of Supererogation? Journal of Philosophical Research 21:405-416.
Jason Kawall (2006). On Promising to Supererogate: A Response to Heyd. Philosophia 34 (2):153-156.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads58 ( #20,318 of 739,336 )
Recent downloads (6 months)17 ( #7,572 of 739,336 )
How can I increase my downloads?