Graduate studies at Western
Sociological Theory 9 (1):87-105 (1991)
|Abstract||In the 1950s and 1960s Freudian theory was deemed to be a vital part of the sociological tradition, but since then it has fallen from favor, largely because of the simplifications and misinterpretations both by Freud's sociological critics and by his supporters. Chief among such misunderstandings is the tendency to view Freud's social theory as a variant of that of Hobbes, in which a selfish and asocial human nature is made social through the imposition of external constraints; these constraints, as Durkheim stated, eventually are "internalized" into the personalities of social beings. Against such a claim this paper argues that Freud's views differ profoundly from those of Hobbes and that the myth of the Hobbesian Freud has so distorted Freud's most fundamental concepts that their social theoretical significance has been largely obscured|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
David Michael Levin (1977). Freud's Divided Heart and Saraha's Cure. Inquiry 20 (1-4):165 – 188.
Constantine Sandis (2009). Hitchcock's Conscious Use of Freud's Unconscious. Europe's Journal of Psychology 3:56-81.
Donovan Miyasaki (2010). Nietzsche Contra Freud on Bad Conscience. Nietzsche-Studien 39.
Kathleen Emmett (1989). Slips of the Tongue. Philosophical Psychology 2 (2):203-222.
Richard R. Askay (1999). A Philosophical Dialogue Between Heidegger and Freud. Journal of Philosophical Research 24:415-443.
Jonathan Lear (2005). Freud. Routledge.
Howard L. Kaye (2003). Was Freud a Medical Scientist or a Social Theorist? The Mysterious "Development of the Hero". Sociological Theory 21 (4):375-397.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads8 ( #131,747 of 724,062 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,087 of 724,062 )
How can I increase my downloads?