David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 81:123-132 (2007)
William of Ockham was tried for heresy due to his assertion that certain qualities can exist independently of substances. Scholars have assumed he made thisstrange assertion in order to account for the Catholic doctrine of transubstantiation. I argue, however, that the assertion was philosophically rather than theologically motivated. Ockham develops a nominalist substance ontology, according to which most changes can be explained as the result of local motion. Knowledge and virtue are changes in human beings that cannot be so explained, however, because they are not entirely passive processes. In fact, knowledge and virtue require free will, which could not be considered truly free if it were not an independently existing quality. In this paper, I explain Ockham’s nominalist substance ontology and show how it functions as the sine qua non foundation for his uncompromising commitment to metaphysical libertarianism
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
William Ockham (1983). Predestination, Foreknowledge, and Future Contingents. Indianapolis: Hackett.
Alfred J. Freddoso (1991). Ontological Reductionism and Faith Versus Reason: A Critique of Adams on Ockham. Faith and Philosophy 8 (3):317-339.
Michael J. Cholbi (2003). Contingency and Divine Knowledge in Ockham. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 77 (1):81-91.
Marilyn McCord Adams (2010). Some Later Medieval Theories of the Eucharist: Thomas Aquinas, Gilles of Rome, Duns Scotus, and William Ockham. [REVIEW] OUP Oxford.
Arthur Stephen McGrade (1974). The Political Thought of William of Ockham. New York]Cambridge University Press.
William J. Courtenay (2008). Ockham and Ockhamism: Studies in the Dissemination and Impact of His Thought. Brill.
Susan Brower-Toland (2014). How Chatton Changed Ockham's Mind: William Ockham and Walter Chatton on Objects and Acts of Judgment. In G. Klima (ed.), Intentionality, Cognition and Mental Representation in Medieval Philosophy. Fordham University Press
Sharon Kaye (1999). Russell, Strawson, and William of Ockham. The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 1999:207-216.
Susan Brower-Toland (2007). Ockham on Judgment, Concepts, and the Problem of Intentionality. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 37 (1):67-110.
Roberto Lambertini (2006). Francis of Marchia and William of Ockham: Fragments From a Dialogue. Vivarium 44 (1):184-204.
Stephen Chak Tornay (1938). Ockham: Studies and Selections. La Salle, Ill.,The Open Court Publishing Company.
Added to index2011-12-01
Total downloads16 ( #239,636 of 1,934,429 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #434,193 of 1,934,429 )
How can I increase my downloads?