Expert or assistant: Supporting power engineers in the management of electricity distribution [Book Review]
Graduate studies at Western
AI and Society 9 (1):91-104 (1995)
|Abstract||A case study is presented of the development of computer-based support tools for power engineers in the electricity supply industry. The objective was to develop an expert system to support witching schedule production. A user-centred approach was followed which led the user community to conclude that a switching schedule production assistant (SSPA) was required which would leave control with the power engineer. Prototype systems were developed and evaluated in user trials which revealed that a significant and more general purpose tool would be a computer generated electricity network display that the engineers could manipulate. The paper concludes that the process of enabling users to evaluate alternative forms of technology can facilitate the development systems that are useful, acceptable and usable|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Ruth Klüser (2009). Current Challenges for Efficient Electricity Grids. Poiesis and Praxis 6 (3-4):265-271.
Willard Downs & Kelley Ann Newton (1989). Legal Implications in Development and Use of Expert Systems in Agriculture. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 2 (1):53-58.
Truls I. Juritzen, Eivind Engebretsen & Kristin Heggen (2013). Subject to Empowerment: The Constitution of Power in an Educational Program for Health Professionals. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 16 (3):443-455.
Josep M. Basart & Montse Serra (2013). Engineering Ethics Beyond Engineers' Ethics. Science and Engineering Ethics 19 (1):179-187.
Paul E. Johnson (1983). What Kind of Expert Should a System Be? Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 8 (1):77-97.
Hui Zhu, Cornelis van Kooten & Amy Sopinka (2010). The Economics Of Hydro And Wind Power In A Carbon Constrained World. Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 21:145-157.
Philip Brey (2008). The Technological Construction of Social Power. Social Epistemology 22 (1):71 – 95.
Geert Demuijnck & Hubert Ngnodjom (2011). Public-Private Partnerships and Corruption in Developing Countries. Business and Professional Ethics Journal 30 (3-4):253-268.
Patricia H. Werhane (1991). Engineers and Management: The Challenge of the Challenger Incident. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 10 (8):605 - 616.
D. Holemans & H. Lodewyckx (1996). A Case Study of Conflicting Interests: Flemish Engineers Involved in Environmental Impact Assessment. Science and Engineering Ethics 2 (1):17-24.
R. Daude, C. Wenk, A. Westerwick, K. Henning & M. Weck (1998). Supporting Skilled Workers at Shopfloor Machine Tools. AI and Society 12 (1-2):29-37.
Omar E. M. Khalil (1993). Artificial Decision-Making and Artificial Ethics: A Management Concern. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 12 (4):313 - 321.
Go Eguchi & Laurence L. Leff (2002). Rule-Based XML. Artificial Intelligence and Law 10 (4):283-294.
Antonino Vaccaro & Dalia Patiño Echeverri (2010). Corporate Transparency and Green Management. Journal of Business Ethics 95 (3):487 - 506.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2010-08-30
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?