David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Medical Ethics 31 (10):582-586 (2005)
Next SectionPreimplantation tissue typing has been proposed as a method for creating a tissue matched child that can serve as a haematopoietic stem cell donor to save its sick sibling in need of a stem cell transplant. Despite recent promising results, many people have expressed their disapproval of this method. This paper addresses the main concerns of these critics: the risk of preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) for the child to be born; the intention to have a donor child; the limits that should be placed on what may be done to the donor child, and whether the intended recipient can be someone other than a sibling. The author will show that these concerns do not constitute a sufficient ground to forbid people to use this technique to save not only a sibling, but also any other loved one’s life. Finally, the author briefly deals with two alternative scenarios: the creation of a human leukocyte antigen (HLA) matched child as an insurance policy, and the banking of HLA matched embryos
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Dr Tim Henning (2013). Retter-Kinder, Instrumentalisierung und Kants Zweckformel. Ethik in der Medizin:1-15.
Similar books and articles
Crystal K. Liu (2007). 'Saviour Siblings'? The Distinction Between PGD with HLA Tissue Typing and Preimplantation HLA Tissue Typing. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 4 (1):65-70.
S. Matthew Liao (2012). Why Children Need to Be Loved. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 15 (3):347-358.
Mhairi Cowden (2012). What's Love Got to Do with It? Why a Child Does Not Have a Right to Be Loved. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 15 (3):325-345.
N. R. Ram (2006). Britain's New Preimplantation Tissue Typing Policy: An Ethical Defence. Journal of Medical Ethics 32 (5):278-282.
Ana Sofia Carvalho & Susana Magalhães (2012). Searching for Otherness: The View of a Novel. Human Reproduction and Genetic Ethics 16 (2):139-164.
S. Matthew Liao (2006). The Right of Children to Be Loved. Journal of Political Philosophy 14 (4):420–440.
Andrew Pessin (1995). Mentalese Syntax: Between a Rock and Two Hard Places. [REVIEW] Philosophical Studies 78 (1):33-53.
Alicia R. Ouellette, Insult to Injury: A Disability-Sensitive Response to Professor Smolensky's Call for Parental Tort Liability for Preimplantation Genetic Interventions.
M. Spriggs (2004). Commodification of Children Again and Non-Disclosure Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis for Huntington's Disease. Journal of Medical Ethics 30 (6):538-538.
S. Marc Cohen (1971). Socrates on the Definition of Piety. Journal of the History of Philosophy 9 (1):1-13.
Mary B. Mahowald (2000). Christian Munthe, Pure Selection: The Ethics of Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis and Choosing Children Without Abortion. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 21 (4):393-397.
B. O. Rump & F. Woonink (2012). Ethical Questions Concerning the Use of Molecular Typing Techniques in the Control of Infectious Diseases. Public Health Ethics 5 (3):311-313.
Janet Malek & Judith Daar (2012). The Case for a Parental Duty to Use Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis for Medical Benefit. American Journal of Bioethics 12 (4):3-11.
Martin Kurthen (1999). Semantic Typing Via Neuronal Assemblies. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (2):296-297.
Added to index2010-08-24
Total downloads25 ( #68,165 of 1,099,034 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #287,293 of 1,099,034 )
How can I increase my downloads?