Graduate studies at Western
|Abstract||Many pr oblems present themselves in at tempting t o discuss Marx's noti on of the fetish characteristics of commodities. It has been argued that it is one of the central points of Marx's en tir e c or pus. 1 It has also been argued that it i s merely "a brilli an t s oci olog i cal genera lization l ! and, even furth er, that it is an Hi ndependent and separate entity, internally hardly related t o Marx's economic theory" .2 How could such a theory be understo od i n such drastically diff erent ways? Perhaps the clue is to be f ound somewhere in Marx' s discussion of the fetishism of commodities itself. Because of the difficulty in un derstanding fetishism , I intend t o examine what Marx himself has t o say first befor e dealing with any points related to the notion of fetishism. Thus , the first parts of this thesis will c onsist of l ong qu otations and repetition of what Marx has t o say. If a noti on may be called ' central' and yet 'hardly related' t o Marx's wor k at the same time, surely a clear examination of this section is necess ary. Aft er an examination of the initial secti ons of Cae ital ] I intend t G examine the f ollowing : the r e lation of fetishism t o the t he ory of alienati on; how one may regard f etishism as a pr oblem f or philosophy; and how, in f act, the theory of fetishism is of prime imp ortance f or an understan ding of Marx's wr itings. What I want to stress throughout is that with o u~ an understanding of what is inherent in the pr oduction of the commodity causing i t t o be necessarily fetishistic, it is practically imp ossible t o understand much of Marx's other writin gs. A commodity appears, at fir st sight, a very trivial thing and easi ly un derst ood. Itsanalysis shows that it i s , in r eality , a very queer thing , abo unding in ~taphysical s ubtleties and theological nic eties|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Only published papers are available at libraries|
Similar books and articles
David M. Rasmussen (1975). The Symbolism of Marx: From Alienation to Fetishism. Philosophy and Social Criticism 3 (1):41-55.
Enrique Dussel (2003). The Concept of Fetishism in Marx's Thought (Elements for a General Marxist Theory of Religion). Radical Philosophy Review 6 (1):1-28.
Enrique Dussel (2003). The Concept of Fetishism in Marx's Thought (Elements for a General Marxist Theory of Religion), Part II of II. Radical Philosophy Review 6 (2):93-129.
Ulrich Steinvorth (1976). I. Marx's Analysis of Commodity Exchange—a Reply to Carver. Inquiry 19 (1-4):99 – 108.
John Milios & Dimitri Dimoulis (2004). Commodity Fetishism Vs. Capital Fetishism: Marxist Interpretations Vis-à-Vis Marx's Analyses in Capital. Historical Materialism 12 (3):3-42.
Terrell Carver (1975). Marx's Commodity Fetishism. Inquiry 18 (1):39 – 63.
David Andrews (2002). Commodity Fetishism as a Form of Life: Language and Value in Wittgenstein and Marx. In G. N. Kitching & Nigel Pleasants (eds.), Marx and Wittgenstein: Knowledge, Morality and Politics. Routledge.
Amy E. Wendling (2009). Karl Marx on Technology and Alienation. Palgrave Macmillan.
Gabriel Egan (2004). Shakespeare and Marx. OUP Oxford.
Alexandra Dobra (2010). What Does Marx Mean by the "Fetishism of Commodities" ? E-Logos Electronic Journal for Philosophy 10 (7):1-9.
Added to index2010-07-21
Total downloads7 ( #142,372 of 739,315 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,243 of 739,315 )
How can I increase my downloads?