David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophy of the Social Sciences 20 (1):5-34 (1990)
Traditionally, debates over the issue of representation in liberalism and in socialism focused on such questions as who or whose interests should be represented in order to attest to the legitimacy of representation. In this article, a different and more fundamental approach is achieved by asking how the representation is accomplished. At this methodological point, liberalism and socialism diverge in their understanding of representative government: Each follows its own philosophical paradigm(s) that underly and justify its position. Differences between liberal and socialist understandings of representation are analytically compared in three pairs of categories: (a) micro versus macro, (b) individual versus class, and (c) the formalistic versus the substantive. The most crucial differences between the social systems are found in the last pair of categories-the formalistic versus the substantive approach to representationbecause different understandings of central concepts such as democracy, freedom, and equality stem from these two frameworks.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Tarja Knuuttila (2011). Modelling and Representing: An Artefactual Approach to Model-Based Representation. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 42 (2):262-271.
Kai Nielsen (2003). Toward a Liberal Socialist Cosmopolitan Nationalism. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 11 (4):437 – 463.
Jeremy Shearmur (2001). Ideas in Politics. Teaching Co..
Mark H. Bickhard (1993). Representational Content in Humans and Machines. Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Artificial Intelligence 5:285-33.
Kai Nielsen (1989). A Moral Case for Socialism. Critical Review 3 (3-4):542-553.
Georgii D. Gloveli (1991). “Socialism of Science” Versus “Socialism of Feelings”: Bogdanov and Lunacharsky. Studies in East European Thought 42 (1):29-55.
David Schweickart, Democratic Socialism Encyclopedia of Activism and Social Justice Sage Reference Project (Forthcoming).
Juliet Williams (2005). Liberalism and the Limits of Power. Palgrave Macmillan.
Kenneth A. Strike (1989). Liberal Justice and the Marxist Critique of Education: A Study of Conflicting Research Programs. Routledge.
Naomi Beck (2005). Enrico Ferri's Scientific Socialism: A Marxist Interpretation of Herbert Spencer's Organic Analogy. [REVIEW] Journal of the History of Biology 38 (2):301 - 325.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads9 ( #151,125 of 1,096,600 )
Recent downloads (6 months)7 ( #29,393 of 1,096,600 )
How can I increase my downloads?