Free play and the foreclosure of New Babylon
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Environment and Planning D 30:418-433 (2012)
Automation may be able to completely eliminate the need for labour. But how should we use the freed-up time? In his proposal for a future urbanism, New Babylon, Constant Nieuwenhuys thought people would engage in nonstop free play, remaking surroundings. I argue that at the core of New Babylon is an intuition about a satisfying life, that of Homo ludens. This intuition had a broad appeal in the 1960s. New Babylon is an intuition pump, not a utopia, and Constant wants Homo ludens to be possible and desirable. Possibility can today be most urgently equated with sustainability.I will argue that New Babylon is not sustainable. I will also argue Homo ludens is not desirable, and 1960s intuitions about the good life have dated. Constant forecloses on creative activity such as we might find in improving science and technology.
|Keywords||New Babylon urbanism Constant Nieuwenhuys Situationist International Surrealism|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Brian Elliott (2009). Debord, Constant, and the Politics of Situationist Urbanism. Radical Philosophy Review 12 (1/2):249-272.
Martin Bidney (2003). By the Rivers of Babylon. International Studies in Philosophy 35 (4):201-202.
B. J. H. (1961). Science Since Babylon. Review of Metaphysics 15 (1):194-195.
Wilfrid Parsons (1940). A Puritan in Babylon. Thought: A Journal of Philosophy 15 (1):163-165.
Richard Wollheim (1962). Babylon, Babylone. Encounter 18 (5):25--36.
F. Haverfield (1915). Herodotus and Babylon. The Classical Review 29 (06):169-170.
James Romm (2007). From Babylon to Baghdad. Classical World: A Quarterly Journal on Antiquity 100 (4):431-435.
Michael Papazian (2007). The Ontological Argument of Diogenes of Babylon. Phronesis 52 (2):188-209.
Michael Papazian (2007). The Ontological Argument of Diogenes of Babylon. Phronesis 52 (2):188 - 209.
Steven L. Ross (1984). Book Review:Imagining Religion: From Babylon to Jonestown. Jonathan Z. Smith. [REVIEW] Ethics 95 (1):169-.
S. Hauerwas & J. Fodor (1998). Remaining in Babylon: Oliver O'Donovan's Defense of Christendom. Studies in Christian Ethics 11 (2):30-55.
Jerry Stannard (1963). Book Review:Science Since Babylon Derek J. De Solla Price. [REVIEW] Philosophy of Science 30 (1):93-.
Jonathan Wright (2011). Whores of Babylon: Catholicism, Gender and Seventeenth Century Print Culture. By Frances E. Dolan. Heythrop Journal 52 (5):870-871.
D. Herbert (1997). Getting By in Babylon: Macintyre, Milbank and a Christian Response To Religious Diversity in the Public Arena. Studies in Christian Ethics 10 (1):61-81.
Stephen R. L. Clark (1996). How Chesterton Read History. Inquiry 39 (3 & 4):343 – 358.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2012-10-23
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?