Open Texture and Judicial Law-Making
Social Theory and Practice 2 (2):177-187 (1972)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,664 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesBrian Bix (1991). H. L. A. Hart and the “Open Texture” of Language. Law and Philosophy 10 (1):51 - 72.
Bruce L. Miller (1972). Open Texture and Judicial Decision. Social Theory and Practice 2 (2):163-175.
Andrew Stranieri, John Zeleznikow, Mark Gawler & Bryn Lewis (1999). A Hybrid Rule – Neural Approach for the Automation of Legal Reasoning in the Discretionary Domain of Family Law in Australia. Artificial Intelligence and Law 7 (2-3).
D. Lyons (1999). Open Texture and the Possibility of Legal Interpretation. Law and Philosophy 18 (3):297-309.
Scott Shapiro (2011). Legality. Harvard University Press.
Ernest Bruncken & Layton B. Register (eds.) (1917/1969). Science of Legal Method. New York,A. M. Kelley.
Timothy Endicott (2011). Morality and the Making of Law: Four Questions. Jurisprudence 1 (2):267-275.
Anthony R. Reeves (2010). Do Judges Have an Obligation to Enforce the Law?: Moral Responsibility and Judicial-Reasoning. Law and Philosophy 29 (2):159-187.
Brian Bix (1993). Law, Language, and Legal Determinacy. Oxford University Press.
Brian E. Butler (2001). Is All Judicial Decision-Making Unavoidably Interpretive? Legal Studies Forum (3&4):315-329.
Eddy M. Zemach (1983). Identity and Open Texture. Philosophia 13 (3-4):255-262.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2011-01-09Total downloads3 ( #201,781 of 549,013 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,261 of 549,013 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
