David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of the Philosophy of History 1 (3):318-345 (2007)
My paper sets out to demonstrate that Weber's ideal-typical theory of concept formation, subject to certain modifications, is compatible with the principles of philosophical hermeneutics and is therefore a valuable strategy of concept formation for interpretive historical inquiry. The essay begins with a brief recapitulation of the philosophical-hermeneutic approach to the human sciences. I then chart out the affinities as well as the discrepancies between philosophical hermeneutics and Weber's theory of the ideal type. Against this backdrop, I proceed to offer a number of correctives and additions to Weber's theory so as to tighten its fit with philosophical hermeneutics. First, I argue that the ideal type's proper logic of concept formation is a logic of significance rather than a logic of commonality. Second, I claim that the relationship between the various empirical cases to which a given ideal type is (or can be) applied is a Wittgensteinian relationship of family resemblance. Finally, I present two main kinds of epistemological functions that ideal types can fulfill within the framework of historical inquiry: argumentative and orientational-clarificatory.
|Keywords||IDEAL TYPE MAX WEBER HERMENEUTICS CONCEPT FORMATION|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Rüdiger W. Waldkirch, Matthias Meyer & Karl Homann (2009). Accounting for the Benefits of Social Security and the Role of Business: Four Ideal Types and Their Different Heuristics. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 89 (3):247 - 267.
John Drysdale (1996). How Are Social-Scientific Concepts Formed? A Reconstruction of Max Weber's Theory of Concept Formation. Sociological Theory 14 (1):71-88.
H. Aronovitch (2012). Interpreting Weber's Ideal-Types. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 42 (3):356-369.
Jeffry L. Ramsey (1994). Ideal Reaction Types and the Reactions of Real Alloys. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1994:149 - 159.
Giovanni Camardi (2004). Ideal Types and Scientific Theories. Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 82 (1):273-285.
Kurt H. Wolff (1980). Max Weber's Theory of Concept Formation: History, Laws, and Ideal Types. Journal of the History of Philosophy 18 (1):103-106.
Szymon Plewik (1994). Ideals of Nowhere Ramsey Sets Are Isomorphic. Journal of Symbolic Logic 59 (2):662-667.
Richard P. Nielsen (1984). Toward an Action Philosophy for Managers Based on Arendt and Tillich. Journal of Business Ethics 3 (2):153 - 161.
Robert Jubb (2012). Tragedies of Non-Ideal Theory. European Journal of Political Theory 11 (3):229-246.
Gertrude Hirsch Hadorn (1997). Webers Idealtypus AlS Methode Zur Bestimmung Des Begriffsinhaltes Theoretischer Begriffe in den Kulturwissenschaften. Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 28 (2):275 - 296.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads26 ( #148,109 of 1,796,251 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #170,249 of 1,796,251 )
How can I increase my downloads?