David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of the History of Philosophy 45 (3):395-411 (2007)
: This article focuses on one aspect of the late mediaeval debate over divine power, as it was discussed by Oxford philosophers Walter Chatton (d. 1343) and William Ockham (d. 1347). Chatton and Ockham would have agreed, for example, that God is ultimately responsible for the existence of the works of Pablo Picasso, but they would not agree over wheher it violates God's omnipotence to say that he cannot make something that Picasso made, for example, the painting Guernica, without using Picasso himself as an intermediate cause. The context of their dispute was a larger debate regarding the ontological status of relations. This article (1) explains how these two issues, omnipotence and relations, became so interestingly tangled together, (2) tries to see which of the two men mentioned above got the better of their exchange, and finally (3) draws out some important consequences for fourteenth-century discussions of causality, occasionalism, and omnipotence
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Michael J. Cholbi (2003). Contingency and Divine Knowledge in Ockham. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 77 (1):81-91.
Tobias Hoffmann (2008). Walter Chatton on the Connection of the Virtues. Quaestio 8 (1):57–82.
Rondo Keele, Walter Chatton. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Henrik Lagerlund (2004). John Buridan and the Problems of Dualism in the Early Fourteenth Century. Journal of the History of Philosophy 42 (4):369-387.
Thomas M. Osborne Jr (2005). Ockham as a Divine-Command Theorist. Religious Studies 41 (1):1 - 22.
Thomas M. Osborne (2005). Ockham as a Divine-Command Theorist. Religious Studies 41 (1):1-22.
Elizabeth Karger (1995). William of Ockham, Walter Chatton and Adam Wodeham on the Objects of Knowledge and Belief. Vivarium 33 (2):171-196.
Susan Brower-Toland (2013). Can God Know More? A Case Study in the Later Medieval Debate About Propositions. In Charles Bolyard & Rondo Keele (eds.), Later Medieval Metaphysics: Ontology, Language, and Logic. Fordham University Press. 161-187.
Susan Brower-Toland (2011). Lectura super sententias: Liber I, distinctiones 1–2, 3–7, 8–17 (review). Journal of the History of Philosophy 49 (1):120-121.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads81 ( #19,539 of 1,413,447 )
Recent downloads (6 months)23 ( #9,049 of 1,413,447 )
How can I increase my downloads?