Graduate studies at Western
|Abstract||From the side of modelers and early-adopter industry, interest in reasoning over conceptual models and other online usage of conceptual models is growing. To obtain a more precise insight in the characteristics of the main conceptual modeling languages, we define the (semi-)standardized ORM, ORM2, UML, ER, and EER diagram languages in terms of the new generic conceptual data modeling language CMcom that is based on the DL language DLRifd. CMcom has the most expressive common denominator with these languages. CMcom advances prospects for automated, online, interoperability among diverse conceptual data models and ensures compatibility with and between industrygrade conceptual data modeling languages.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
|Through your library||Only published papers are available at libraries|
Similar books and articles
Martijn Meeter, Janneke Jehee & Jaap Murre (2007). Neural Models That Convince: Model Hierarchies and Other Strategies to Bridge the Gap Between Behavior and the Brain. Philosophical Psychology 20 (6):749 – 772.
Xinli Wang (2007). Conceptual Schemes and Presuppositional Languages. The Proceedings of XXI World Congress of Philosophy 6:119-124.
Robert L. Ashenhurst (1996). Ontological Aspects of Information Modeling. Minds and Machines 6 (3):287-394.
Timothy R. Colburn (1998). Information Modeling Aspects of Software Development. Minds and Machines 8 (3):375-393.
Isabelle Peschard (2011). Modeling and Experimenting. In Paul Humphreys & Cyrille Imbert (eds.), Models, Simulations, and Representations. Routledge.
Lynn Santelmann (1999). The Power of Cross-Linguistic Analysis: A Key Tool for Developing Explanatory Models of Human Language. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (6):1036-1037.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads2 ( #246,545 of 739,350 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?