Toulmin's rhetorical logic: What's the warrant for warrants?
Philosophy and Rhetoric 41 (1):22-50 (2008)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,711 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesJohn Nolt (2008). Truth as an Epistemic Ideal. Journal of Philosophical Logic 37 (3).
Andrew Aberdein (2005). The Uses of Argument in Mathematics. Argumentation 19 (3):287-301.
Harold H. Kuester (1985). The Dependence of Stephen Toulmin's Epistemology on a Description/Prescription Dichotomy. Philosophy Research Archives 11:521-530.
Michael Huemer (2005). Logical Properties of Warrant. Philosophical Studies 122 (2):171 - 182.
Rebecca Kukla (2006). Objectivity and Perspective in Empirical Knowledge. Episteme 3 (1-2):80-95.
Otto Bird (unknown). The Re-Discovery of the “Topics”: Professor Toulmin's Inference-Warrants. :200-205.
Kevin Wm Wildes (1994). Respondeo: Method and Content in Casuistry. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 19 (1):115-119.
Jonathan Kvanvig (1995). ``Coherentism: Misconstrual and Misapprehension&Quot. Southwest Philosophy Review 11 (1):159-169.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads8 ( #123,255 of 551,007 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,425 of 551,007 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
