Graduate studies at Western
Faith and Philosophy 5 (1):40-60 (1988)
|Abstract||In a recent issue of Faith and Philosophy, Stephen Davis argues that it is rational for supernaturalists, though not for naturalists, to believe in the resurrection of Jesus Christ in (roughly) the sense of an event which happened to Jesus in which Jesus, though he had truly died, was restored to life and consciousness and after which his living body left the tomb. After making some clarifications regarding supernaturalism and the concept of a miracle, I argue that Davis has not shown this. My case against Davis rests essentially on two claims: (1) we cannot today reconstruct what the resurrection involved because there is no clear, historically reliable account of what the resurrection was thought to be by those who directly experienced the Easter event; and (2) we do not have sufficient evidence to make it rational to believe that the resurrection is part of a pattern of nonnatural events in which God has acted for similar ends, yet belief that there is such a pattern is needed if belief in the resurrection in Davis’ sense is to be rational|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Michael Martin (2000). Christianity and the Rationality of the Resurrection. Philo 3 (1):52-62.
Stephen T. Davis (1999). Is Belief in the Resurrection Rational? Philo 2 (1):51-61.
Robert Greg Cavin (1995). Is There Sufficient Historical Evidence to Establish the Resurrection of Jesus? Faith and Philosophy 12 (3):361-379.
Stephen T. Davis (2000). The Rationality of Resurrection for Christians. Philo 3 (1):41-51.
Stephen T. Davis (2006). Christian Philosophical Theology. Oxford University Press.
Daniel Howard-Snyder (2003). On Hume's Philosophical Case Against Miracles. In Christopher Bernard (ed.), God Matters: Readings in the Philosophy of Religion. Longman Publications.
N. N. (2005). Review of The Resurrection of God Incarnate. [REVIEW] Faith and Philosophy 22 (2):235 - 238.
Michael Martin (1998). Why the Resurrection is Initially Improbable. Philo 1 (1):63-73.
Richard Swinburne (2005). The Probability of the Resurrection. In Andrew Dole & Andrew Chignell (eds.), God and the Ethics of Belief: New Essays in Philosophy of Religion. Cambridge University Press.
Stephen T. Davis (2001). Physicalism and Resurrection. In Kevin J. Corcoran (ed.), Soul, Body, and Survival. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Stephen T. Davis (1988). Traditional Christian Belief in the Resurrection of the Body. The New Scholasticism 62 (1):72-97.
Eric Steinhart (2008). The Revision Theory of Resurrection. Religious Studies 44 (1):63-81.
Lynne Rudder Baker (2007). Persons and the Metaphysics of Resurrection. Religious Studies 43 (3):333-348.
Granville C. Henry (1995). Does Process Thought Allow Personal Immortality? Religious Studies 31 (3):311 - 321.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2011-01-09
Total downloads1 ( #291,948 of 731,463 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?