Democratic virtue, comparative ethics, and contemporary Islam

Journal of Religious Ethics 33 (4):697-707 (2005)
This essay illustrates the kind of moral analysis Jeffrey Stout advocates in "Democracy and Tradition" by way of examining a conversation among Muslims that took place between June and December 2002. Their debate centers on al-Qaìda's legitimacy as God's chosen defender of Islam, which is called into question due to the tension between al-Qaìda's military tactics and the concepts of honorable combat held within the Islamic tradition. This giving and taking of reasons in both defense and detraction of al-Qaìda's tactics demonstrates the living reality of Islamic tradition--the ongoing process of striving to discern God's will in light of communal agreements about the authority of certain texts and the validity of established rules for interpreting them
Keywords jihad  divine law governance  Shari`a reasoning  comparative religious ethics  Jeffrey Stout
Categories (categorize this paper)
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 9,351
External links
  •   Try with proxy.
  • Through your library Configure
    References found in this work BETA

    No references found.

    Citations of this work BETA
    Similar books and articles
    John Kelsay (2003). Al-Shaybani and the Islamic Law of War. Journal of Military Ethics 2 (1):63-75.

    Monthly downloads

    Added to index


    Total downloads

    2 ( #258,148 of 1,088,380 )

    Recent downloads (6 months)

    1 ( #69,601 of 1,088,380 )

    How can I increase my downloads?

    My notes
    Sign in to use this feature

    Start a new thread
    There  are no threads in this forum
    Nothing in this forum yet.