David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Ethics and Behavior 13 (3):211 – 219 (2003)
The Internet appears to offer psychologists doing research unrestricted access to infinite amounts and types of data. However, the ethical issues surrounding the use of data and data collection methods are challenging research review boards at many institutions. This article illuminates some of the obstacles facing researchers who wish to take advantage of the Internet's flexibility. The applications of the APA ethical codes for conducting research on human participants on the Internet are reviewed. The principle of beneficence, as well as privacy and confidentiality, informed consent, deception, and avoiding harm are all illustrated through the use of a hypothetical online study.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Kara Emery (2014). So You Want to Do an Online Study: Ethics Considerations and Lessons Learned. Ethics and Behavior 24 (4):293-303.
Connie K. Varnhagen, Matthew Gushta, Jason Daniels, Tara C. Peters, Neil Parmar, Danielle Law, Rachel Hirsch, Bonnie Sadler Takach & Tom Johnson (2005). How Informed is Online Informed Consent? Ethics and Behavior 15 (1):37 – 48.
Jenny Y. Wang & Elizabeth A. Kitsis (2013). Tangling the Web: Deception in Online Research. American Journal of Bioethics 13 (11):59-61.
Similar books and articles
E. Dye Danielle, Beverley McNamara Leanne Youngs & Peter O’Leary Jack Goldblatt (2010). The Disclosure of Genetic Information: A Human Research Ethics Perspective. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 7 (1).
Vivien Runnels, Elizabeth Hay, Elyse Sevigny & Paddi O’Hara (2009). The Ethics of Conducting Community-Engaged Homelessness Research. Journal of Academic Ethics 7 (1-2):57-68.
Elizabeth H. Bassett & Kate O'Riordan (2002). Ethics of Internet Research: Contesting the Human Subjects Research Model. Ethics and Information Technology 4 (3):233-247.
Craig A. Childress & Joy K. Asamen (1998). The Emerging Relationship of Psychology and the Internet: Proposed Guidelines for Conducting Internet Intervention Research. Ethics and Behavior 8 (1):19 – 35.
Robert Van Es, Warren French & Felix Stellmaszek (2004). Resolving Conflicts Over Ethical Issues: Face-to-Face Versus Internet Negotiations. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 53 (1/2):165 - 172.
Robert van Es, Warren French & Felix Stellmaszek (2004). Resolving Conflicts Over Ethical Issues: Face-to-Face Versus Internet Negotiations. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 53 (1-2):165-172.
Ayodele S. Jegede (2009). Understanding Informed Consent for Participation in International Health Research. Developing World Bioethics 9 (2):81-87.
Daniel O. Taube & Susan Burkhardt (1997). Ethical and Legal Risks Associated with Archival Research. Ethics and Behavior 7 (1):59 – 67.
Heather A. Kitchin (2003). The Tri-Council Policy Statement and Research in Cyberspace: Research Ethics, the Internet, and Revising a 'Living Document'. [REVIEW] Journal of Academic Ethics 1 (4):397-418.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads55 ( #33,609 of 1,413,259 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #154,925 of 1,413,259 )
How can I increase my downloads?