Historical analysis of Goldsworthy's sovereignty of parliament

Abstract This article was presented as an historical analysis of Jeffrey Goldswothy's book, The Sovereignty of Parliament (OUP 1999) at a Symposium organized by the Australian Society of Legal Philosophy. It takes issue with Goldsworthy's definition of 'parliament' as 'the King in Parliament' and focusses on the critical role of the monarch as an integral part of the legal Parliament. It argues that restrictions on the power of both monarch and of the Parliament are placed by the terms of the oath of governance (or coronation oath) so that Parliament may not enact whatever it wishes i.e. it is not sovereign. Rather ultimate sovereignty is to be found in the terms of the sovereign's oath of governance. It examines the historical record to support the argument.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 5,865
External links
  •   Try with proxy.
  • Through your library Only published papers are available at libraries

    Similar books and articles

    Analytics

    Monthly downloads

    Added to index

    2009-01-28

    Total downloads

    4 ( #180,404 of 556,774 )

    Recent downloads (6 months)

    0

    How can I increase my downloads?


    My notes
    Sign in to use this feature


    Discussion
    Start a new thread
    Order:
    There  are no threads in this forum
    Nothing in this forum yet.

    Other forums