David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Husserl Studies 24 (1):15-30 (2008)
Those familiar with contemporary continental philosophy know well the defenses Husserlians have offered of Husserl’s theory of inner time-consciousness against post-modernism’s deconstructive criticisms. As post-modernism gives way to Deleuzean post-structuralism, Deleuze’s Le bergsonisme has grown into the movement of Bergsonism. This movement, designed to present an alternative to phenomenology, challenges Husserlian phenomenology by criticizing the most “important… of all phenomenological problems.” Arguing that Husserl’s theory of time-consciousness detailed a linear succession of iterable instants in which the now internal to consciousness receives prejudicial favor, Bergsonism concludes that Husserl derived the past from the present and cannot account for the sense of the past, which differs in kind from the present. Consequently, everything on Husserl’s account remains present and his theory cannot accommodate for time’s passage. In this paper, I renew the Husserlian defense of Husserl’s theory of time-consciousness in response to the recent movement of Deleuzean Bergsonism. Section one presents Bergsonism’s notion of the past in general and its critique of Husserl’s theory of time-consciousness. Section two presents a rejoinder to Bergsonism’s critique of Husserl, questioning (1) its understanding of the living-present as linearly extended, (2) its conflation of the living-present with Husserl’s early schema-apprehension interpretation, and (3) its failure to grasp Husserl’s revised understanding of primary memory as a result of (2). In conclusion, I suggest that Husserl’s theory of retention might articulate a notion of the past more consistent with Bergson than Bergsonism itself.
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Gilles Deleuze (1994). Difference and Repetition. Athlone Press.
Dan Zahavi (1999). Self-Awareness and Alterity: A Phenomenological Investigation. Northwestern University Press.
G. Deleuze (2000). The Logic of Sense. Filosoficky Casopis 48 (5):799-808.
Gilles Deleuze (1988). Bergsonism. Zone Books.
Citations of this work BETA
Corry Shores (2014). In the Still of the Moment: Deleuze's Phenomena of Motionless Time. Deleuze Studies 8 (2):199-229.
Similar books and articles
Mirja Hartimo (2012). Husserl and the Algebra of Logic: Husserl's 1896 Lectures. [REVIEW] Axiomathes 22 (1):121-133.
Martin Schwab (2006). The Fate of Phenomenology in Deconstruction: Derrida and Husserl. Inquiry 49 (4):353 – 379.
Klaus Held (2007). Phenomenology of 'Authentic Time' in Husserl and Heidegger. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 15 (3):327 – 347.
Jane Chamberlain (2002). Thinking Time. Journal of Philosophical Research 27:281-299.
Alia Al-Saji (2004). The Memory of Another Past: Bergson, Deleuze and a New Theory of Time. [REVIEW] Continental Philosophy Review 37 (2):203-239.
Alia Al-Saji (2009). An Absence That Counts in the World: Merleau-Ponty’s Later Philosophy of Time in Light of Bernet’s 'Einleitung'. Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology 40 (2):207-227.
Paul Ricœur (1967/2007). Husserl: An Analysis of His Phenomenology. Northwestern University Press.
Shaun Gallagher (1979). Suggestions Towards a Revision of Husserl's Phenomenology of Time-Consciousness. Man and World 12 (4):445-464.
Michael R. Kelly (2004). On the Mind's Pronouncement of Time. Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 78:247-262.
Michael R. Kelly (2009). The Consciousness of Succession. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 83 (1):127-139.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads75 ( #54,858 of 1,792,100 )
Recent downloads (6 months)10 ( #80,587 of 1,792,100 )
How can I increase my downloads?