Iconoclasm in Aesthetics

Cambridge University Press (2003)
Abstract
Although philosophers have characteristically taken the view that art is a vehicle of some universal meaning or truth, art historians emphasize the concrete, historical location of the individual work of art. Is aesthetics capable of sustaining these two approaches? Or, as Michael Kelly argues: Is art actually determined by its historical particularity? His book covers the views of four philosophers--Heidegger, Adorno, Derrida, and Danto--ultimately iconoclasts, despite their significant philosophical engagement with the arts
Keywords Aesthetics, Modern
Categories (categorize this paper)
Buy the book $84.29 new (14% off)   $84.51 used (14% off)   $87.23 direct from Amazon (11% off)    Amazon page
Call number BH201.K45 2003
ISBN(s) 0521822092   9780521822091
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 11,365
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Citations of this work BETA
Lev Kreft (2012). Sport as a Drama. Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 39 (2):219-234.
Similar books and articles
Analytics

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2009-01-28

Total downloads

31 ( #57,204 of 1,102,731 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

3 ( #120,386 of 1,102,731 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Start a new thread
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.