Newman Studies Journal 8 (2):29-41 (2011)
|Abstract||Can Newman be classified as an “historian”? On the one hand, Newman did not adhere to, indeed cared very little for, modern scientific methods of empirical research; he detested the cold, clinical nature of German intellectualism of the mid-ninetheenth century. On the other hand, Newman’s historical investigation relied upon conservative methods of historical research: the use of original sources and the rules of historical criticism; his techniques were self-taught, but they were adequate to meet the historical standards of his times. Most importantly, Newman never conceived of himself purely and simply as an historian: he studied history in the service of religion and, for example, examined the fourth century in order to provide answers to the theological questions of the nineteenth|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
John T. Ford (2005). John Henry Newman as Contextual Theologian. Newman Studies Journal 2 (2):60-76.
Ono Ekeh (2011). Newman's Account of Ambrose St. John's Death. Newman Studies Journal 8 (2):5-18.
Adam Stewart (2010). John Henry Newman and Andrew Martin Fairbairn. Newman Studies Journal 7 (2):6-17.
Stephanie Terril (2004). An Implicit Model of “Conception” in the Theological Papers of John Henry Newman on Faith and Certainty. Newman Studies Journal 1 (2):62-89.
Robert Barron (2005). John Henry Newman Among the Postmoderns. Newman Studies Journal 2 (1):20-31.
Lawrence Cross (2006). John Henry Newman. Newman Studies Journal 3 (1):5-11.
Wolfgang Kienzler (2006). Wittgenstein and John Henry Newman on Certainty. Grazer Philosophische Studien 71 (1):117-138.
Ono Ekeh (2008). The Phenomenological Context and Transcendentalism of John Henry Newman and Edmund Husserl. Newman Studies Journal 5 (1):35-50.
Kevin Mongrain (2008). John Henry Newman on Ecclesial Spiritual Life. Newman Studies Journal 5 (1):19-34.
John Henry Newman (1969). The Philosophical Notebook of John Henry Newman. Louvain, Nauwelaerts Pub. House.
Rosario Athié (2005). “My Dear Miss Giberne”. Newman Studies Journal 2 (1):58-78.
Peter M. J. Stravinskas (2004). Newman the Failure. Newman Studies Journal 1 (2):16-25.
Ryan Vilbig (2011). John Henry Newman's View of the “Darwin Theory”. Newman Studies Journal 8 (2):52-61.
Robert Saley (2010). Two Models of Figural Historiography. Newman Studies Journal 7 (2):18-28.
Patrick Sherry (2011). John Henry Newman and William Froude, F.R.S. Heythrop Journal 52 (3):399-409.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2012-03-18
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?