Graduate studies at Western
|Abstract||Philosophical logicians proposing theories of rational belief revision have had little to say about whether their proposals assist or impede the agent's ability to reliably arrive at the truth as his beliefs change through time. On the other hand, reliability is the central concern of formal learning theory. In this paper we investigate the belief revision theory of Alchourron, Gardenfors and Makinson from a learning theoretic point of view.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
|Through your library||Only published papers are available at libraries|
Similar books and articles
Kelly Oliver & Christina Hendricks (eds.) (1999). Language and Liberation: Feminism, Philosophy and Language,. SUNY Press.
Kevin T. Kelly, Oliver Schulte & Cory Juhl (1997). Learning Theory and the Philosophy of Science. Philosophy of Science 64 (2):245-267.
Kevin T. Kelly & Oliver Schulte (1995). The Computable Testability of Theories Making Uncomputable Predictions. Erkenntnis 43 (1):29 - 66.
Kevin T. Kelly (1999). Iterated Belief Revision, Reliability, and Inductive Amnesia. Erkenntnis 50 (1):11-58.
Oliver Schulte, Formal Learning Theory. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Oliver Schulte (1999). Minimal Belief Change and the Pareto Principle. Synthese 118 (3):329-361.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads7 ( #142,848 of 757,560 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,427 of 757,560 )
How can I increase my downloads?