David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophy and Theology 9 (1/2):177-200 (1995)
Karl Rahner’s analysis of genetic manipulation is found most explicitly in two articles written in 1966 and 1968: “The Experiment with Man,” and “The Problem of Genetic Manipulation.” The articles have received some attention in ethical literature. The present paper analyzes Rahner’s use of theological and ethical principles, comparing and contrasting the two articles. In the first article, Rahner emphasizes humankind’s essential openness to self-creativity. What has always been true on the transcendental level—-we choose our final destiny and thus create ourselves—-may now be possible as well on the categorial or historical level. Thus we Christians have no a-priori theological warrant for rejecting genetic manipulation.But there is a considerable difference in Rahner’s second article. Whereas in the first he makes no immediate ethical application, in the second he introduces both a normative principle—-there ought never be a fundamental separation of procreation and marital intercourse—-and a metaethical concept--his “moral instinct of faith”—-to enable him to deal specifically with artificial insemination by third party donor, a procedure he rejects. There is also a shift in emphasis in his anthropological approach from the first to the second article.A close analysis of his method here discloses some difficulties concerning the “moral instinct of faith” and forces us to ask how principles of theological anthropology are and ought to be applied to questions like genetic manipulation. I conclude with my own proposal for the use of theological principles in medical ethics
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Karl Rahner (2006). Faith. Philosophy and Theology 18 (2):393-399.
Heinrich Fries (2004). Theological Method According to John Henry Newman and Karl Rahner. Philosophy and Theology 16 (1):163-193.
Jessica M. Murdoch (2010). Overcoming the Foundationalist/Nonfoundationalist Divide. Philosophy and Theology 22 (1/2):373-387.
Richard Lennan (2005). Faith in Context: Rahner on the Possibility of Belief. Philosophy and Theology 17 (1/2):233-258.
Thomas F. O'Meara (1998). Teaching Karl Rahner. Philosophy and Theology 11 (1):191-205.
Timothy P. Muldoon (1997). Germain Grisez on Karl Rahner's Theory of Fundamental Option. Philosophy and Theology 10 (1):227-254.
Nicholas Adams (2000). The Present Made Future. Faith and Philosophy 17 (2):191-211.
John F. Perry (2001). Ripalda and Rahner. Philosophy and Theology 13 (2):339-361.
Peter Joseph Fritz (2011). “I Am, of Course, No Prophet”. Philosophy and Theology 23 (2):317-332.
Paul G. Crowley (2000). Rahner, Doctrine and Ecclesial Pluralism. Philosophy and Theology 12 (1):131-154.
Denis Edwards (2006). Resurrection of the Body and Transformation of the Universe in the Theology of Karl Rahner. Philosophy and Theology 18 (2):357-383.
Geffrey B. Kelly (1995). “Unconscious Christianity” And The “Anonymous Christian” in The Theology of Dietrich Bonhoeffer And Karl Rahner. Philosophy and Theology 9 (1/2):117-149.
Kenneth D. Eberhard (1971). Karl Rahner and the Supernatural Existential. Thought 46 (4):537-561.
Mark Joseph T. Calano (2008). Rahnerian Freedom. Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 20:51-68.
Added to index2011-01-09
Total downloads2 ( #258,312 of 1,088,905 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #69,735 of 1,088,905 )
How can I increase my downloads?