David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Episteme 3 (3):248-265 (2006)
Although John Stuart Mill places considerable emphasis on three information signalling devices – debate, votes and prices – he remains curiously sceptical about the prospects of institutional or social epistemology. In this paper, I explore Mill's modest scepticism about institutional epistemolog y and compare and contrast that with the attitudes of liberal theorists such as F. A. Hayek and John Dewey who are much more enthusiastic about the prospects of social epistemology as part of their defences of liberalism. The paper examines the extent to which Hayek and Dewey ignore concerns originally raised by Mill. I conclude that Mill's modest scepticism is reflected in the epistemological abstinence of contemporary liberal philosophers such as John Rawls, and that his elevation of philosophy over democracy remains a challenge to contemporary defenders of the political value of social or institutional epistemology
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Andrew Gamble (1996). Hayek: The Iron Cage of Liberty. Westview Press.
Alan Haworth (1998). Free Speech. Routledge.
Thomas Nagel (1987). Moral Conflict and Political Legitimacy. Philosophy and Public Affairs 16 (3):215-240.
John Rawls (1971/2005). A Theory of Justice. Harvard University Press.
John Rawls (1993). Political Liberalism. Columbia University Press.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Nadia Urbinati & Alex Zakaras (eds.) (2007). J.S. Mill's Political Thought: A Bicentennial Reassessment. Cambridge University Press.
D. G. Brown (2012). Mill's Justice and Political Liberalism. In Leonard Kahn (ed.), Mill on Justice. Palgrave Macmillan. 135.
John Skorupski (2006). Why Read Mill Today. Routledge.
Sean Johnston (2010). Conceptions of the Good and the Ubiquity of Power. Social Philosophy Today 26:83-90.
John Gray (2000). Mill's Liberalism and Liberalism's Posterity. Journal of Ethics 4 (1-2):137-165.
Maurice Cowling (1990). Mill and Liberalism. Cambridge University Press.
Chandran Kukathas (1989). Hayek and Modern Liberalism. Oxford University Press.
Mariana Szapuova (2006). Mill's Liberal Feminism: Its Legacy and Current Criticism. Prolegomena 5 (2):179-191.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads18 ( #132,590 of 1,696,507 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #246,076 of 1,696,507 )
How can I increase my downloads?