David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 30 (2):189 – 206 (2005)
The medical profession and medical ethics currently place a greater emphasis on physician responsibility than patient responsibility. This imbalance is not due to accident or a mistake but, rather is motivated by strong moral reasons. As we debate the nature and extent of patient responsibility it is important to keep in mind the reasons for giving a relatively minimal role to patient responsibility in medical ethics. It is argued that the medical profession ought to be characterized by two moral asymmetries: (1) Even if some degree of responsible behavior from patients is called for, placing the dominant emphasis on professional responsibility over patient responsibility is largely correct. The value of protecting the right to refuse treatment and arguments against paternalism block a more expansive account of patient responsibility and support a strong notion of professional responsibility. (2) Insofar as we do want to encourage an increase in patient responsibility, we have good reasons to emphasize prospective rather than retrospective notions of responsibility in clinical practice. Concerns about patient vulnerability along with the determined factors in disease leave little room for blame at the bedside. These two asymmetries generate normative limits on any positive account of patient responsibility.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
S. B. Levin (2012). The Doctor-Patient Tie in Plato's Laws: A Backdrop for Reflection. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 37 (4):351-372.
Paul C. Snelling (2012). Saying Something Interesting About Responsibility for Health. Nursing Philosophy 13 (3):161-178.
Leonard M. Fleck (2012). Whoopie Pies, Supersized Fries. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 21 (01):5-19.
Alena Buyx (2010). Können, sollen, müssen? Public Health-Politik und libertärer Paternalismus. Ethik in der Medizin 22 (3):221-234.
Similar books and articles
Vilhjálmur Árnason (1994). Towards Authentic Conversations. Authenticity in the Patient-Professional Relationship. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 15 (3).
Virginia A. Sharpe (2000). Behind Closed Doors: Accountability and Responsibility in Patient Care. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 25 (1):28 – 47.
Dawson S. Schultz & Franco A. Carnevale (1996). Engagement and Suffering in Responsible Caregiving: On Overcoming Maleficience in Health Care. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 17 (3).
Dan C. English (2005). Moral Obligations of Patients: A Clinical View. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 30 (2):139 – 152.
Nancy S. Jecker (1990). Integrating Medical Ethics with Normative Theory: Patient Advocacy and Social Responsibility. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 11 (2).
Alfred I. Tauber (2003). Autonomy Gone Mad. Philosophy in the Contemporary World 10 (1):75-80.
Susan Budd & Ursula Sharma (eds.) (1994). The Healing Bond: The Patient-Practitioner Relationship and Therapeutic Responsibility. Routledge.
Candace Cummins Gauthier (2005). The Virtue of Moral Responsibility and the Obligations of Patients. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 30 (2):153 – 166.
P. Burcher (2012). The Noncompliant Patient: A Kantian and Levinasian Response. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 37 (1):74-89.
Kenneth Kipnis (2011). Impairing Loyalty: Corporate Responsibility for Clinical Misadventure. American Journal of Bioethics 11 (9):3-9.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads21 ( #81,671 of 1,101,623 )
Recent downloads (6 months)9 ( #23,343 of 1,101,623 )
How can I increase my downloads?