Graduate studies at Western
Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 78:247-262 (2004)
|Abstract||This essay contests the standard historical comparison that links Husserl’s account of time-consciousness to the tradition by way of Book XI of Augustine’sConfessions. This comparison rests on the mistaken assumption that both thinkers attribute the soul’s distention and corresponding apprehension of time to memory. While true for Augustine and Husserl’s 1905 lectures on time, Husserl concluded after 1907 that these lectures advanced the flawed and counter-intuitive position that memory extends perception. I will trace the shortcomings of Augustine’s and Husserl’s conflation of memory with perception. After developing Husserl’s maturely articulated distinction between memory and retention from 1911, I suggest chapters 10–14 of Aristotle’s Physics IV as a more apt anticipation of this second, more adequate half of the Husserlian story. A reconstruction of Aristotle’s definition of time as “the number of movement,” one that privileges the activity of “the mind pronouncing that the ‘nows’ are two,” intimates Husserl’s distinction between memory and retention. For Aristotle, the soul’s recognition of the ‘nows’ as two depends not on memory, but on the soul’s intentional activity of counting, itself dependent on the ability to, as Aristotle writes in his Metaphysics, “grasp mentally and [have] already grasped” at the same time|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Roger Wasserman (2008). On a Common and Unmooted (Neo-)Platonic Source for the Husserlian and Augustinian Conceptions of Memory. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 82 (2):293-315.
Roger Wasserman (2008). On a Common and Unmooted (Neo-)Platonic Source for the Husserlian and Augustinian Conceptions of Memory: A Response to Michael R. Kelly. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 82 (2):293-315.
Michael R. Kelly (2009). The Consciousness of Succession. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 83 (1):127-139.
Michael R. Kelly (2008). Husserl, Deleuzean Bergsonism and the Sense of the Past in General. Husserl Studies 24 (1):15-30.
Stephen David Ross (2010). Re-Membering. International Studies in Philosophy Monograph Series:43-59.
Christoph Hoerl & Teresa McCormack (eds.) (2001). Time and Memory: Issues in Philosophy and Psychology. Oxford University Press.
Dan Zahavi (2007). Perception of Duration Presupposes Duration of Perception - or Does It? Husserl and Dainton on Time. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 15 (3):453 – 471.
Tim Loughlin (2011). Souls and the Location of Time in Physics IV 14, 223a16–223a29. Apeiron 4 (4):307-325.
Jane Chamberlain (2002). Thinking Time. Journal of Philosophical Research 27:281-299.
Michael G. F. Martin (2001). Out of the Past: Episodic Recall as Retained Acquaintance. In Christoph Hoerl & Teresa McCormack (eds.), Time and Memory. Oxford University Press.
Alia Al-Saji (2009). An Absence That Counts in the World: Merleau-Ponty’s Later Philosophy of Time in Light of Bernet’s 'Einleitung'. Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology 40 (2):207-227.
Arun Kumar Pokhrel (2009). Representations of Time and Memory in Holocaust Literature. Journal of Philosophy: A Cross-Disciplinary Inquiry 4 (8):27-37.
Pedro M. S. Alves (2008). Objective Time and the Experience of Time: Husserl's Theory of Time in Light of Some Theses of A. Einstein's Special Theory of Relativity. [REVIEW] Husserl Studies 24 (3):205-229.
Aaron L. Mishara (1990). Husserl and Freud: Time, Memory and the Unconscious. [REVIEW] Husserl Studies 7 (1):29-58.
Charles Scott (1999). Memory of Time in the Light of Flesh. Continental Philosophy Review 32 (4):421-432.
Added to index2011-12-01
Total downloads6 ( #154,923 of 739,406 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,680 of 739,406 )
How can I increase my downloads?