Response to papers for “ethnography, anthropology, and comparative religious ethics” focus

Journal of Religious Ethics 38 (3):485-493 (2010)
The Center for the Study of World Religions (CSWR) project represented here through papers by Thomas Lewis, Aaron Stalnaker, Hans Lucht, and Lee Yearley (with responses) was motivated by the judgment that the trend toward a focus on virtue ethics, with attendant concern for techniques of forming selves, creates an opportunity for a dialogue with ethnographers. I argue that the CSWR essays neglect social and institutional considerations, as well as overdrawing the distinction between “formalist” and virtue approaches to the study of comparative ethics
Keywords Lewis  Mahmood  Lucht  comparative ethics  Stalnaker  Prasad  Yearley
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9795.2010.00442.x
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 16,667
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

View all 12 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
John Kelsay (2014). Response to Bucar and Stalnaker. Journal of Religious Ethics 42 (3):564-570.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

9 ( #257,483 of 1,726,249 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

2 ( #264,055 of 1,726,249 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.