Noûs 38 (1):60–85 (2004)
|Abstract||If you are more likely to continue a course of action in virtue of having previously invested in that course of action, then you tend to honor sunk costs. It is widely thought both that (i) individuals often do give some weight to sunk costs in their decision-making and that (ii) it is irrational for them to do so. In this paper I attempt to cast doubt on the conventional wisdom about sunk costs, understood as the conjunction of these two claims.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
David Johnstone (2002). Behavioral and Prescriptive Explanations of a Reverse Sunk Cost Effect. Theory and Decision 53 (3):209-242.
A. Ross Otto (2010). Three Attempts to Replicate the Behavioral Sunk-Cost Effect: A Note on Cunha and Caldieraro (2009). Cognitive Science 34 (8):1379-1383.
Marcus Cunha & Fabio Caldieraro (2010). On the Observability of Purely Behavioral Sunk-Cost Effects: Theoretical and Empirical Support for the BISC Model. Cognitive Science 34 (8):1384-1387.
Douglas W. Portmore (2007). Welfare, Achievement, and Self-Sacrifice. Journal of Ethics & Social Philosophy 2 (2):1-28.
David Ramsay Steele (1996). Nozick on Sunk Costs. Ethics 106 (3):605-620.
Theodore Pavlic & Kevin Passino (2011). The Sunk-Cost Effect as an Optimal Rate-Maximizing Behavior. Acta Biotheoretica 59 (1):53-66.
Kevin M. Passino (forthcoming). The Sunk-Cost Effect as an Optimal Rate-Maximizing Behavior. Acta Biotheoretica.
Douglas Walton (2002). The Sunk Costs Fallacy or Argument From Waste. Argumentation 16 (4):473-503.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads26 ( #53,576 of 722,826 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #60,541 of 722,826 )
How can I increase my downloads?