David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Phronesis 53 (2):180-208 (2008)
Aristotle introduces Physics I as an inquiry into principles; in this paper I ask where he argues for the position he reaches in I 7. Many hold that his definitive argument is found in the first half of I 7 itself; I argue that this view is mistaken: the considerations raised there do not form the basis of any self-standing argument for Aristotle's doctrine of principles, but rather play a subordinate role in a larger argument begun in earnest in I 5. This larger argument stalls in I 6, which ends in aporta; I argue that the problem lies in the fact that Aristotle's reasoning in I 6 thoroughly undermines his reasoning in I 5 (on which I 6 is ostensibly supposed to build). I further argue that the materials necessary for resolving this problem, and thereby allowing the argument begun in I 5 to reach its proper conclusion, are supplied by the thesis that organizes the first half of I 7. Along the way I offer some remarks about Aristotle's doctrine of principles, arguing that it is about the principles of natural substance (as opposed to coming to be or change). I also offer some remarks about the thesis which organizes the first half of I 7.1 argue negatively that it is not anything like a preliminary statement of Aristotle's doctrine of principles. I argue positively that it reflects Aristotle's idea that there are two distinct kinds of effect change has upon things (one constructive, the other destructive). One of these effects lies behind Aristotle's reasoning in I 5, the other comes to the fore in 16; the achievement of the first half of I 7 is to reconcile these seemingly competing conceptions by finding a place for them both in a unified account of coming to be and its subjects
|Keywords||CHANGE PHYSICS PRINCIPLE HYLOMORPHISM ARISTOTLE|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Donna H. Lloyd (1993). The Physics of Metaphysics: Everything You Wanted to Know About the Universe and Your Place in It but Did Not Know What to Ask. Deltaran Pub. Co..
Cecilia Trifogli (2000). Oxford Physics in the Thirteenth Century (Ca. 1250-1270): Motion, Infinity, Place, and Time. Brill.
Christopher J. S. Clarke (1995). The Nonlocality of Mind. Journal of Consciousness Studies 2 (3):231-40.
Alexander Rosenberg (1989). Russell Versus Steiner on Physics and Causality. Philosophy of Science 56 (2):341-347.
José María Garrido Bermúdez (2010). Grossmann and Millán-Puelles on the Argument From Physics. Metaphysica 11 (2):163-180.
Benjamin Morison (2002). On Location: Aristotle's Concept of Place. Oxford University Press.
Agustín Vicente (2006). On the Causal Completeness of Physics. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 20 (2):149 – 171.
Sean Kelsey (2008). The Place of I 7 in the Argument of "Physics" I. Phronesis 53 (2):180 - 208.
Added to index2010-07-20
Total downloads49 ( #85,621 of 1,902,204 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #205,335 of 1,902,204 )
How can I increase my downloads?