Caesar from Frege's perspective
Dialectica 59 (2):179–199 (2005)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | No categories specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,882 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesP. G. Walsh (1968). The Fame of Caesar Otto Seel: Caesar-Studien. Pp. 136. Stuttgart: Ernst Klett, 1967. Paper, DM.7.60. Detlef Rasmussen (Ed.): Caesar. (Wege der Forschung, Xliii.) Pp. Xi+522; 31 Plates. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 1967. Cloth, DM.39.80. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 18 (03):311-313.
Bob Hale (1994). Dummett's Critique of Wright's Attempt to Resuscitate Frege. Philosophia Mathematica 2 (2):122-147.
Dirk Greimann (2003). What is Frege's Julius Caesar Problem? Dialectica 57 (3):261–278.
John Perry (1993). Executions, Motivations, and Accomplishments. Philosophical Review 102 (4):515 - 540.
John O'Leary-Hawthorne & Jeffrey K. McDonough (1998). Numbers, Minds, and Bodies: A Fresh Look at Mind-Body Dualism. Philosophical Perspectives 12 (S12):349-371.
Matthias Schirn (2003). Fregean Abstraction, Referential Indeterminacy and the Logical Foundations of Arithmetic. Erkenntnis 59 (2):203 - 232.
Richard Heck (2005). Julius Caesar and Basic Law V. Dialectica 59 (2):161–178.
Richard Heck (1997). The Julius Caesar Objection. In R. Heck (ed.), Language, Thought, and Logic: Essays in Honour of Michael Dummett. Oxford University Press.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads8 ( #124,608 of 556,916 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #64,931 of 556,916 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
