Interests and Structure in Dualist Social Theory: A Critical Appraisal of Archer's Theoretical and Empirical Arguments
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophy of the Social Sciences 42 (4):489-510 (2012)
This article evaluates the structural conception of interests developed by Margaret Archer as part of her dualist version of critical realism. It argues that this structural analysis of interests is untenable because, first, Archer’s account of the causal influence of interests on agents is contradictory and, second, Archer fails to offer a defensible account of her claim that interests influence agents by providing reasons for action. These problems are explored in relation to Archer’s theoretical and empirical work. I argue for an alternative account of interests that focuses on agents’ understandings of their interests and problems with these understandings
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Mark Carrigan (2010). Realism, Reflexivity, Conflation, and Individualism. Journal of Critical Realism 9 (3):384-396.
Thomas Sturm (2001). Margaret S. Archer, Being Human: The Problem of Agency. [REVIEW] Metapsychology 5 (46).
Dave Elder-Vass (2007). Reconciling Archer and Bourdieu in an Emergentist Theory of Action. Sociological Theory 25 (4):325 - 346.
François Dépelteau (2008). Relational Thinking: A Critique of Co-Deterministic Theories of Structure and Agency. Sociological Theory 26 (1):51 - 73.
Stephen Kemp & John Holmwood (2012). Questioning Contingency in Social Life: Roles, Agreement and Agency. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 42 (4):403-424.
Margaret Scotford Archer (2000). Being Human: The Problem of Agency. Cambridge University Press.
Eric T. Olson (2010). Ethics and the Generous Ontology. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 31 (4):259-270.
Dave Elder-vass (2007). For Emergence: Refining Archer's Account of Social Structure. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 37 (1):25–44.
Aaron Simmons (2010). Two Arguments Against Biological Interests. Environmental Ethics 32 (3):229-245.
Warren Neill (1998). An Emotocentric Theory of Interests. Environmental Ethics 20 (2):163-182.
D. Micah Hester (2007). Interests and Neonates: There is More to the Story Than We Explicitly Acknowledge. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 28 (5):357-372.
Julia Tanner (2007). Can Animals have preference-interests? Ethic@ 6 (1):35-40.
Margaret S. Archer (2010). Critical Realism and Relational Sociology: Complementarity and Synergy. Journal of Critical Realism 9 (2):199-207.
Jonathan Eastwood (2005). The Role of Ideas in Weber's Theory of Interests. Critical Review 17 (1-2):89-100.
Added to index2011-12-16
Total downloads15 ( #232,658 of 1,792,061 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #463,566 of 1,792,061 )
How can I increase my downloads?