David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 21 (2):259-273 (1990)
Summary For A. F. J. Thibaut, the main concern was a philosophical approach to the interpretation and systematization of the positive Roman Law in his time. In his eyes, the object of a subjective right is an action, not a thing or person. Therefore he was cautious not to use abstractions, definitions, and deductions from dreamt postulates. Regarding the logical texture of an institute of private law as a âGestalt , it follows that the equity of the reason, of a law, for different cases, is the same thing as that âGestalt . The philosophical interpretation of a law is then an interpretation in respect to its âGestalt . Although Thibaut's main concern was the interpretation of the positive Roman Law in his time (the âGemeinrecht ) he did not disregard the history of Roman Law before and especially after Justinian
|Keywords||Gestalt Gleichheit des Grundes Handlung Kennzeichnung Natur der Sache Naturrecht philosophische Geschichtsschreibung ratio legis Rechtsgeschichte Typus|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Jürgen V. Kempski (1990). Notizen Zu A. F. J. Thibauts Pandektenwissenschaft. Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 21 (2):259 - 273.
Joseph Raz (2009). Between Authority and Interpretation: On the Theory of Law and Practical Reason. Oxford University Press.
Max Hamburger (1965). Morals and Law. New York, Biblo and Tannen.
Patrick J. Glen, Why Plessy/Brown and Bowers/Lawrence Are Correct: Thomistic Natural Law as the Content of a Moral Constitutional Interpretation.
John Arthur & William H. Shaw (eds.) (2010). Readings in the Philosophy of Law. Pearson Prentice Hall.
Kent Greenawalt (2010). Legal Interpretation: Perspectives From Other Disciplines and Private Texts. Oxford University Press.
John W. Martens (2003). One God, One Law: Philo of Alexandria on the Mosaic and Greco-Roman Law. Brill Academic Publishers.
David-Hillel Ruben (1972). Positive and Natural Law Revisited. Modern Schoolman 49 (May):295-317.
Andrei Marmor (ed.) (1995). Law and Interpretation: Essays in Legal Philosophy. Oxford University Press.
Oscar James Brown (1981). Natural Rectitude and Divine Law in Aquinas: An Approach to an Integral Interpretation of the Thomistic Doctrine of Law. Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies.
Kent Greenawalt (2010). Comparative Legal Interpretation. Oxford University Press.
David M. Adams (ed.) (1996). Philosophical Problems in the Law. Wadsworth Pub..
Roger A. Shiner (1992). Norm and Nature: The Movements of Legal Thought. Oxford University Press.
Ernest Bruncken & Layton B. Register (eds.) (1917). Science of Legal Method. New York,A. M. Kelley.
Roger Stuart Berkowitz (2005). The Gift of Science: Leibniz and the Modern Legal Tradition. Harvard University Press.
Added to index2010-09-02
Total downloads7 ( #428,141 of 1,906,946 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #468,378 of 1,906,946 )
How can I increase my downloads?