David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 75 (1):70–91 (2007)
Aquinas’s admirers, reacting against Donald Davidson’s criticisms of hirn, commonly argue (a) that the will does play a role in Aquinas’s account of incontinence, and (b) that his explanation of incontinent action turns on the weakness of the will. The first part of this paper argues that they are correct about (a) but wholly mistaken about (b). Aquinas rarely even mentions the weakness of the will, and he neverinvokes it to explain why someone acts counter to her own better judgment. In his view, such a person has the capacity for self-control but fails to exercise it. The second part of the paper considers Gary Watson’s account of incontinence, including and especially his objections to analyzing it as the failure to exercise one’s capacity for self-control. Here I argue that Aquinas’s account better serves the purposesof moral discourse and that it should not be expected to provide the kind of causal explanation Watson seeks.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Anthony J. Lisska (2006). A Look at Inner Sense in Aquinas: A Long-Neglected Faculty Psychology. Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 80:1-19.
Theresa Weynand Tobin (2009). Taming Augustine's Monstrosity. Journal of Philosophical Research 34:345-363.
Ignacio Silva (2013). Thomas Aquinas Holds Fast: Objections to Aquinas Within Today's Debate on Divine Action. Heythrop Journal 54 (4):658-667.
Gary Watson (1977). Skepticism About Weakness of Will. Philosophical Review 86 (3):316-339.
Christopher M. Brown (2001). Aquinas on the Individuation of Non-Living Substances. Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 75:237-254.
Edmund Henden (2004). Intentions, All-Out Evaluations and Weakness of the Will. Erkenntnis 61 (1):53-74.
Robert Audi (1979). Weakness of Will and Practical Judgment. Noûs 13 (2):173-196.
John F. Wippel (2003). Norman Kretzmann on Aquinas's Attribution of Will and of Freedom to Create to God. Religious Studies 39 (3):287-298.
Charles P. Nemeth (2008). Aquinas on Crime. St. Augustine's Press.
Tobias Hoffmann (2006). Aquinas on the Moral Progress of the Weak Willed. In Tobias Hoffmann, Jörn Müller & Matthias Perkams (eds.), The Problem of Weakness of Will in Medieval Philosophy. Peeters
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads42 ( #104,114 of 1,934,702 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #434,264 of 1,934,702 )
How can I increase my downloads?